These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21872122)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.
    Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Okafuji T; Sunami S; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 21872122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study.
    Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Sakai S; Furuya A; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Honda H
    Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1365-71. PubMed ID: 17093968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
    Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic performance of detecting breast cancer on computed radiographic (CR) mammograms: comparison of hard copy film, 3-megapixel liquid-crystal-display (LCD) monitor and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.
    Yamada T; Suzuki A; Uchiyama N; Ohuchi N; Takahashi S
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2363-9. PubMed ID: 18491108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitors and 5-megapixel liquid crystal monitors for soft-copy reading in full-field digital mammography.
    Schueller G; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Pinker K; Memarsadeghi M; Weber M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 19481396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of 3-megapixel and 5-megapixel monitors on detecting micro-calcification in high- and low-resolution breast images].
    Hu X; Gu Y; Wu B; Li R; Peng W; Mao J; Zheng X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 30(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 23858741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of breast cancer by soft-copy reading of digital mammograms: comparison between a routine image-processing parameter and high-contrast parameters.
    Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Sakai S; Setoguchi T; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Honda H
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 19922328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-field digital mammography on LCD versus CRT monitors.
    Zuley ML; Willison KM; Bonaccio E; Miller DP; Leong DL; Seifert PJ; Somerville P; Destounis S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1492-8. PubMed ID: 17114542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors.
    Yabuuchi H; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Matsumura T; Yamasaki Y; Morishita J; Honda H
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Apr; 58(4):403-407. PubMed ID: 27307027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observer study for evaluating potential utility of a super-high-resolution LCD in the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms.
    Shiraishi J; Abe H; Ichikawa K; Schmidt RA; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Apr; 23(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 19277785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
    Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
    Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of the grayscale standard display function to general purpose liquid-crystal display monitors for clinical use].
    Tanaka N; Naka K; Sueoka M; Higashida Y; Morishita J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Jan; 66(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20145361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.