BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21873002)

  • 1. Repair of flexor digitorum profundus to distal phalanx: a biomechanical evaluation of four techniques.
    Lee SK; Fajardo M; Kardashian G; Klein J; Tsai P; Christoforou D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 36(10):1604-9. PubMed ID: 21873002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair.
    McCallister WV; Ambrose HC; Katolik LI; Trumble TE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Feb; 31(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 16473686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone suture anchors versus the pullout button for repair of distal profundus tendon injuries: a comparison of strength in human cadaveric hands.
    Brustein M; Pellegrini J; Choueka J; Heminger H; Mass D
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 May; 26(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 11418912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cyclic testing of pullout sutures and micro-mitek suture anchors in flexor digitorum profundus tendon distal fixation.
    Latendresse K; Dona E; Scougall PJ; Schreuder FB; Puchert E; Walsh WR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 15925154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
    Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Zone I flexor digitorum profundus repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of tendon to bone repair in cadavera.
    Dovan TT; Gelberman RH; Kusano N; Calcaterra M; Silva MJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 30(2):258-66. PubMed ID: 15781347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical characteristics of suture anchor implants for flexor digitorum profundus repair.
    Halát G; Negrin L; Koch T; Erhart J; Platzer P; Hajdu S; Streicher J
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Feb; 39(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 24480686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    McLarney E; Hoffman H; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Mar; 24(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 10194013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reattachment of flexor digitorum profundus avulsion: biomechanical performance of 3 techniques.
    Brar R; Owen JR; Melikian R; Gaston RG; Wayne JS; Isaacs JE
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Nov; 39(11):2214-9. PubMed ID: 25227598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.
    Belyea CM; Abbasi P; Sanghavi KK; Giladi AM; Means KR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2023 Dec; 48(12):1276.e1-1276.e7. PubMed ID: 35778231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanic comparison of the Teno Fix tendon repair device with the cruciate and modified Kessler techniques.
    Wolfe SW; Willis AA; Campbell D; Clabeaux J; Wright TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 32(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 17336844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New "loop" suture for FDP zone I injuries.
    Kapickis M
    Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg; 2009 Sep; 13(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 19730043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single side locking on the opposite of the modified Kessler tendon repair prevents gap formation and suture pull-out: a biomechanical evaluation in sheep tendons.
    Doğramaci Y; Kalaci A; Sevinç TT; Süner G; Emir A; Yanat AN
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2009; 20(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 19619114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon-to-bone repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis of 3 pullout suture techniques.
    Silva MJ; Hollstien SB; Brodt MD; Boyer MI; Tetro AM; Gelberman RH
    J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Jan; 23(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 9523965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of an all-inside suture technique with traditional pull-out suture and suture anchor repair techniques for flexor digitorum profundus attachment to bone.
    Chu JY; Chen T; Awad HA; Elfar J; Hammert WC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 38(6):1084-90. PubMed ID: 23578439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simplifying four-strand flexor tendon repair using double-stranded suture: a comparative ex vivo study on tensile strength and bulking.
    Low TH; Ahmad TS; Ng ES
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2012 Feb; 37(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 21636621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative analysis of the six-strand double-loop flexor tendon repair and three other techniques: a human cadaveric study.
    Gill RS; Lim BH; Shatford RA; Toth E; Voor MJ; Tsai TM
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Nov; 24(6):1315-22. PubMed ID: 10584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of transosseous versus suture anchor repair of the subscapularis tendon.
    Wheeler DJ; Garabekyan T; Lugo R; Buckley JM; Jones C; Lotz M; Lotz JC; Ma CB
    Arthroscopy; 2010 Apr; 26(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 20362822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrusion of bone anchor suture following flexor digitorum profundus tendon avulsion injury repair.
    Tiong WH; O'Sullivan ST
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1242-4. PubMed ID: 21324766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of peripheral suture depth on strength of tendon repairs.
    Diao E; Hariharan JS; Soejima O; Lotz JC
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Mar; 21(2):234-9. PubMed ID: 8683052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.