95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2187376)
1. Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution.
Wong DH; Tremper KK; Stemmer EA; O'Connor D; Wilbur S; Zaccari J; Reeves C; Weidoff P; Trujillo RJ
Anesthesiology; 1990 May; 72(5):784-92. PubMed ID: 2187376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.
Spinale FG; Reines HD; Crawford FA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 Apr; 45(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3355284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous noninvasive estimation of cardiac output by electrical bioimpedance: an experimental study in dogs.
Tremper KK; Hufstedler SM; Barker SJ; Zaccari J; Harris D; Anderson S; Roohk V
Crit Care Med; 1986 Mar; 14(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 3943340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.
Spahn DR; Schmid ER; Tornic M; Jenni R; von Segesser L; Turina M; Baetscher A
J Cardiothorac Anesth; 1990 Feb; 4(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 2131856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of transthoracic bioimpedance to determine cardiac output in pediatric patients.
Introna RP; Pruett JK; Crumrine RC; Cuadrado AR
Crit Care Med; 1988 Nov; 16(11):1101-5. PubMed ID: 3168502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.
van der Meer BJ; Woltjer HH; Sousman AM; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Huybregts MA; de Vries PM
Intensive Care Med; 1996 Oct; 22(10):1120-4. PubMed ID: 8923081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Axler O; Tousignant C; Thompson CR; Dall'ava-Santucci J; Phang PT; Russell JA; Walley KR
J Crit Care; 1996 Sep; 11(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 8891961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of impedance cardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Panagiotou M; Vogiatzis I; Jayasekera G; Louvaris Z; Mackenzie A; Mcglinchey N; Baker JS; Church AC; Peacock AJ; Johnson MK
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Mar; 38(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 28168802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of 2 modified Fick methods and thermodilution for determining the cardiac output in patients with mechanical ventilation].
Corbanese U; Possamai C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 May; 61(5):191-9. PubMed ID: 7478050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients: abnormal body weight gives unreliable cardiac output measurements.
van der Meer BJ; de Vries JP; Schreuder WO; Bulder ER; Eysman L; de Vries PM
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1997 Jun; 41(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 9241329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flow-regulated extracorporeal arteriovenous tubing loop for cardiac output measurements by ultrasound velocity dilution: validation in post-cardiac surgery intensive care unit patients.
Eremenko AA; Safarov PN
ASAIO J; 2010; 56(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 21245798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.
van Drumpt A; van Bommel J; Hoeks S; Grüne F; Wolvetang T; Bekkers J; Ter Horst M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28288587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new method of using gas exchange measurements for the noninvasive determination of cardiac output: clinical experiences in adults following cardiac surgery.
Osterlund B; Gedeon A; Krill P; Johansson G; Reiz S
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1995 Aug; 39(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 7484024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution, thoracic electrical bioimpedance and Doppler ultrasound.
Castor G; Klocke RK; Stoll M; Helms J; Niedermark I
Br J Anaesth; 1994 Jan; 72(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 8110539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of a new generation transesophageal Doppler device for cardiac output monitoring.
Schmid ER; Spahn DR; Tornic M
Anesth Analg; 1993 Nov; 77(5):971-9. PubMed ID: 8214736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure.
Leslie SJ; McKee S; Newby DE; Webb DJ; Denvir MA
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Oct; 9(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 15472501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
