These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21874891)

  • 1. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson HH
    SADJ; 2011 Apr; 66(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 21874891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Mar; 38(2):78-80, 82-4. PubMed ID: 21500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The opinions of manufacturers of resin-based composite materials towards the repair of failing composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Newton JT; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Oct; 16(4):149-53. PubMed ID: 19796516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 21972940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defective direct composite restorations--replace or repair? A survey of teaching in Scandinavian dental schools.
    Blum IR; Mjör IA; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Wilson NH
    Swed Dent J; 2003; 27(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 14608966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing repair of dental restorations with resin composite.
    Blum IR; Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2014; 6():81-7. PubMed ID: 25378952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: all-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    SADJ; 2011 May; 66(4):158, 160-3. PubMed ID: 23193851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence?
    Sharif MO; Fedorowicz Z; Tickle M; Brunton PA
    Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 20798721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cohort investigation of the changes in vocational dental practitioners' views on repairing defective direct composite restorations.
    Blum IR; Newton JT; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; Suppl():27-30. PubMed ID: 16192929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Repair and revision 1. Repair or replacement of amalgam].
    Penning C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Feb; 108(2):46-9. PubMed ID: 11383278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repair of defective Class I composite resin restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Sep; 21(9):695-8. PubMed ID: 2094873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.
    Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.