BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21875878)

  • 1. Lumbar canal spinal stenosis due to axial skeletal calcinosis and heterotopic ossification in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: successful spinal decompression.
    Weerakoon A; Sharp D; Chapman J; Clunie G
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2011 Nov; 50(11):2144-6. PubMed ID: 21875878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. En bloc resection of lamina and ossified ligamentum flavum in the treatment of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum.
    Jia LS; Chen XS; Zhou SY; Shao J; Zhu W
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Jun; 66(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 20495433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
    Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal claudication due to myxopapillary ependymoma.
    Stacpoole SR; McGuigan C; Lewis SJ; Phadke R; Stevens J; Choi D; Kapoor R
    Pract Neurol; 2007 Nov; 7(6):394-6. PubMed ID: 18024779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.
    Schenck C; van Susante J; van Gorp M; Belder R; Vleggeert-Lankamp C
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comment on the paper "Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion" (Travis Hunt et al.).
    Bach CM
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):315. PubMed ID: 17520300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [If it becomes too narrow for the spinal cord--plea for a joint venture].
    Rompe JD; Pfeil J
    Orthopade; 2003 Oct; 32(10):847. PubMed ID: 14579014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].
    Korge A; Mehren C; Ruetten S
    Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):824-830. PubMed ID: 31053867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical treatment of multiple spinal canal stenoses associated with vitamin D-resistant rickets.
    Kawaguchi A; Miyamoto K; Wakahara K; Hosoe H; Miura A; Hanamoto T; Shimizu K
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 May; 16(5):717-9. PubMed ID: 19264492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laminarthrectomy.
    Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1993-4. PubMed ID: 19936802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microsurgical decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mayer HM; Korge A
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1989-1990. PubMed ID: 19937063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcome of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis: minimum five-year follow-up.
    Toyoda H; Nakamura H; Konishi S; Dohzono S; Kato M; Matsuda H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 20847714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative evaluation of quality of life in lumbar spinal stenosis patients following instrumented posterior decompression.
    Aykaç B; Copuroğlu C; Ozcan M; Ciftdemir M; Yalnız E
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2011; 45(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21478662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traumatic canal stenosis should not be an indication for surgical decompression in thoracolumbar burst fracture.
    Zhao X; Fang XQ; Zhao FD; Fan SW
    Med Hypotheses; 2010 Dec; 75(6):550-2. PubMed ID: 20708338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increase in spinal canal area after inverse laminoplasty: an anatomical study.
    Yücesoy K; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(21):2771-6. PubMed ID: 11064522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of neuroforaminal decompression in degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Gill TJ; Mason MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):135-9. PubMed ID: 9553545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation on effect of the reformative laminectomy for treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis].
    Zhang SD; Feng SB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Jan; 22(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 19203042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.