119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21877001)
1. [Costs of mammogram campaigns in the Regional Health Division of Marília, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2005-2006].
Marconato RR; Soárez PC; Ciconelli RM
Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1529-36. PubMed ID: 21877001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic assessment of a geographically defined population at a mastology referral hospital in São Paulo Brazil.
Caetano S; Junior JM; Finguerman F; Goldman SM; Szejnfeld J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74270. PubMed ID: 24066130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Factors associated with lack of mammograms and clinical breast examination by women: a population-based study in Campinas, São Paulo State, Brazil].
Amorim VM; Barros MB; César CL; Carandina L; Goldbaum M
Cad Saude Publica; 2008 Nov; 24(11):2623-32. PubMed ID: 19009142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Difficult Access and Poor Productivity: Mammography Screening in Brazil.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; Correa RDS; Peixoto JE; Ribeiro NV; Ferreira NC; Soares LR
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jun; 20(6):1857-1864. PubMed ID: 31244310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the results after using of the BI-RADS categories in 1,777 clinical mammograms].
Hauth EA; Khan K; Wolfgarten B; Betzler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Radiologe; 2008 Mar; 48(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 17265008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 10-year opportunistic mammographic screening scenario in Brazil and its impact on breast cancer early detection: a nationwide population-based study.
Cuoghi IC; da Silva Soares MF; Dos Santos GMC; Dos-Reis FJC; Poli-Neto OB; de Andrade JM; Bosquesi PL; Orlandini LF; Tiezzi DG
J Glob Health; 2022 Oct; 12():04061. PubMed ID: 36227588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An estimate of the cost of treating melanoma disease in the state of Sao Paulo - Brazil.
Souza RJ; Mattedi AP; Rezende ML; Corrêa Mde P; Duarte EM
An Bras Dermatol; 2009 Jul; 84(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 19668936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linked claims and medical records for cancer case management : evaluation of mammography abnormalities.
Eberl MM; Watroba N; Reinhardt M; Pomerantz J; Serghany J; Broffman G; Fox CH; Mahoney MC; Edge SB
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):518-24. PubMed ID: 17577210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presumed prevalence analysis on suspected and highly suspected breast cancer lesions in São Paulo using BIRADS criteria.
Milani V; Goldman SM; Finguerman F; Pinotti M; Ribeiro CS; Abdalla N; Szejnfeld J
Sao Paulo Med J; 2007 Jul; 125(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 17992390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography in asymptomatic women aged 40-49 years.
Silva FX; Katz L; Souza AS; Amorim MM
Rev Saude Publica; 2014 Dec; 48(6):931-9. PubMed ID: 26039396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An estimate of the cost of treating non-melanoma skin cancer in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.
Souza RJ; Mattedi AP; Corrêa MP; Rezende ML; Ferreira AC
An Bras Dermatol; 2011; 86(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 21987129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R81-R88. PubMed ID: 27814820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs.
Bassett LW; Shayestehfar B; Hirbawi I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1083-6. PubMed ID: 7976879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of unconventional utilization of BI-RADS category 3 assessment at opportunistic screening.
Altas H; Tureli D; Cengic I; Kucukkaya F; Aribal E; Kaya H
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 26019241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induced costs of low-cost screening mammography.
Cyrlak D
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 3406395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Estimated mammogram coverage in Goiás State, Brazil].
Corrêa Rda S; Freitas-Júnior R; Peixoto JE; Rodrigues DC; Lemos ME; Marins LA; Silveira EA
Cad Saude Publica; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1757-67. PubMed ID: 21986603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey of Alabama physicians' use of mammography, 1989.
Lorino CO; Green AE; Harris JM
South Med J; 1990 Nov; 83(11):1280-2, 1288. PubMed ID: 2237556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
