These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides. Farley NE; Kennedy K; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23527361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers. Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Stumpel LJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 20156227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cerec Guide: rapid and streamlined manufacture of surgical guides in dental practice. Bindl A; Ritter L; Mehl A Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 22930947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Flügge T; Derksen W; Te Poel J; Hassan B; Nelson K; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 27440381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. Patel N J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141 Suppl 2():20S-4S. PubMed ID: 20516111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. Park C; Raigrodski AJ; Rosen J; Spiekerman C; London RM J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 19463664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography imaging as a primary diagnostic tool for computer-guided surgery and CAD-CAM interim removable and fixed dental prostheses. Charette JR; Goldberg J; Harris BT; Morton D; Llop DR; Lin WS J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 27086108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. Fortin T; Champleboux G; Lormée J; Coudert JL J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 11831236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technology makes a complicated implant restoration simple. Kosinski T Dent Today; 2011 Sep; 30(9):128, 130, 132-5. PubMed ID: 21980729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study. Derksen W; Wismeijer D; Flügge T; Hassan B; Tahmaseb A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1005-1015. PubMed ID: 31330566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report. Oh JH; An X; Jeong SM; Choi BH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 75(12):2541-2549. PubMed ID: 28881181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter? Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]