These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21877775)

  • 1. Acquisition of detailed laryngeal flow measurements in geometrically realistic models.
    Farley J; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL82-6. PubMed ID: 21877775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct simultaneous measurement of intraglottal geometry and velocity fields in excised larynges.
    Khosla S; Oren L; Ying J; Gutmark E
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Apr; 124 Suppl 2():S1-13. PubMed ID: 24510612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraglottal velocity and pressure measurements in a hemilarynx model.
    Oren L; Gutmark E; Khosla S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):935-43. PubMed ID: 25698025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct-numerical simulation of the glottal jet and vocal-fold dynamics in a three-dimensional laryngeal model.
    Zheng X; Mittal R; Xue Q; Bielamowicz S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):404-15. PubMed ID: 21786908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flow-induced vibratory response of idealized versus magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic vocal fold models.
    Pickup BA; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):EL124-9. PubMed ID: 20815428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraglottal geometry and velocity measurements in canine larynges.
    Oren L; Khosla S; Gutmark E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):380-8. PubMed ID: 24437778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of flow-structure interaction in the larynx during phonation using an immersed-boundary method.
    Luo H; Mittal R; Bielamowicz SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):816-24. PubMed ID: 19640046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Material and shape optimization for multi-layered vocal fold models using transient loadings.
    Schmidt B; Leugering G; Stingl M; Hüttner B; Agaimy A; Döllinger M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23927124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of False Vocal Folds on Laryngeal Flow Resistance in a Tubular Three-dimensional Computational Laryngeal Model.
    Xue Q; Zheng X
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):275-281. PubMed ID: 27178452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamics of the Driving Force During the Normal Vocal Fold Vibration Cycle.
    DeJonckere PH; Lebacq J; Titze IR
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):649-661. PubMed ID: 28495329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of acoustic loading on an effective single mass model of the vocal folds.
    Zañartu M; Mongeau L; Wodicka GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1119-29. PubMed ID: 17348533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vibratory responses of synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold models.
    Murray PR; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3428-38. PubMed ID: 23145623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear source-filter coupling due to the addition of a simplified vocal tract model for excised larynx experiments.
    Smith BL; Nemcek SP; Swinarski KA; Jiang JJ
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 23490131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principal dimensions of voice production and their role in vocal expression.
    Zhang Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Jul; 156(1):278-283. PubMed ID: 38980102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the acoustical relevance of supraglottal flow structures to low-frequency voice production.
    Zhang Z; Neubauer J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL378-83. PubMed ID: 21218861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrically conductive synthetic vocal fold replicas for voice production research.
    Syndergaard KL; Dushku S; Thomson SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL63. PubMed ID: 28764459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing liquid redistribution in a biphasic vibrating vocal fold using finite element analysis.
    Kvit AA; Devine EE; Jiang JJ; Vamos AC; Tao C
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 25619469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical characterization of vocal fold tissue: a review study.
    Miri AK
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):657-67. PubMed ID: 25008382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of the false vocal fold gaps on intralaryngeal pressure distributions and their effects on phonation.
    Li S; Wan M; Wang S
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1045-51. PubMed ID: 18989648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A lumped mucosal wave model of the vocal folds revisited: recent extensions and oscillation hysteresis.
    Lucero JC; Koenig LL; Lourenço KG; Ruty N; Pelorson X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1568-79. PubMed ID: 21428520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.