These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21877811)

  • 21. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N; Woodruff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
    de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.
    Cooke M; Aubanel V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4126. PubMed ID: 28618803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
    Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Bernstein JG; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):473-88. PubMed ID: 21786913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3689-95. PubMed ID: 20550267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reconstruction techniques for improving the perceptual quality of binary masked speech.
    Williamson DS; Wang Y; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):892-902. PubMed ID: 25096123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Channel selection in the modulation domain for improved speech intelligibility in noise.
    Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2904-13. PubMed ID: 22501068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
    Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.