375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21877812)
1. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of masker type on early reflection processing and speech intelligibility (L).
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 23297878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise.
Smits C; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22087927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
Mens LH
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of spatial and temporal integration of a single early reflection on speech intelligibility.
Warzybok A; Rennies J; Brand T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):269-82. PubMed ID: 23297901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers.
Collin B; Lavandier M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1146-59. PubMed ID: 23927114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
