These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2187787)
1. Classification of gastric carcinoma. Borchard F Hepatogastroenterology; 1990 Apr; 37(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 2187787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Celen O; Yildirim E; Gülben K; Berberoğlu U Eur J Surg Suppl; 2003 Jul; (588):33-9. PubMed ID: 15200041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma. Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Roder JD; Böttcher K; Busch R; Wittekind C; Hermanek P; Siewert JR Cancer; 1998 Feb; 82(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 9477092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The TNM classification in stomach carcinoma--the problem of T2 tumors]. Siewert JR; Böttcher K; Bollschweiler E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1991 Mar; 116(12):473-5. PubMed ID: 2004591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma. Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathological characteristics of stage 1 gastric cancer: comparison of macroscopic and microscopic findings. Baba H; Ohshiro T; Yamamoto M; Endo K; Adachi E; Kakeji Y; Kohnoe S; Maehara Y; Sugimachi K Hepatogastroenterology; 1997; 44(14):554-8. PubMed ID: 9164536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The new TNM classification and staging of stomach cancer]. Hermanek P Leber Magen Darm; 1989 Jul; 19(4):169-72, 175-9. PubMed ID: 2677567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined for the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification of gastric carcinoma. Ichikura T; Ogawa T; Chochi K; Kawabata T; Sugasawa H; Mochizuki H World J Surg; 2003 Mar; 27(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 12607061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: correlation between new and old UICC TNM classification. Omejc M; Juvan R; Jelenc F; Repse S Int Surg; 2001; 86(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11890334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Katai H; Yoshimura K; Maruyama K; Sasako M; Sano T Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1796-800. PubMed ID: 10760754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer. Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Relationship between new TNM classification and the prognosis and biological behavior of gastric cancer]. Wang Z; Xu H; Wang S; Chen J Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jul; 38(7):493-5. PubMed ID: 11832089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing an appropriate staging system for esophageal carcinoma. Kunisaki C; Akiyama H; Nomura M; Matsuda G; Otsuka Y; Ono HA; Shimada H J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):884-90. PubMed ID: 16310691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel subclassification of pT2 gastric cancers according to the depth of muscularis propria invasion: superficial muscularis propria versus deep muscularis propria/subserosa. Sun Z; Zhu GL; Lu C; Guo PT; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu Y; Wang ZN; Xu HM Ann Surg; 2009 May; 249(5):768-75. PubMed ID: 19387327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems. Ikeguchi M; Murakami D; Kanaji S; Ohro S; Maeta Y; Yamaguchi K; Tatebe S; Kondo A; Tsujitani S; Kaibara N ANZ J Surg; 2004 Oct; 74(10):852-4. PubMed ID: 15456431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of the ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer: an analysis based on a Chinese population. Wang X; Wan F; Pan J; Yu GZ; Chen Y; Wang JJ J Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 99(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 19208438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma. Hayashi H; Ochiai T; Suzuki T; Shimada H; Hori S; Takeda A; Miyazawa Y Surgery; 2000 Feb; 127(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 10686976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]