These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21878460)

  • 1. On the power of the Cochran-Armitage test for trend in the presence of misclassification.
    Buonaccorsi JP; Laake P; Veierød MB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Jun; 23(3):218-43. PubMed ID: 21878460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of application of Cochran-Armitage trend test and linear regression analysis for rate trend analysis in epidemiology study].
    Wang DZ; Wang C; Shen CF; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Song GD; Xue XD; Xu ZL; Zhang S; Jiang GH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 38(5):684-687. PubMed ID: 28651412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power comparison of Cochran-Armitage trend test against allelic and genotypic tests in large-scale case-control genetic association studies.
    Emily M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2657-2673. PubMed ID: 28008794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of diagnostic error on testing genetic association in case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Tian X
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 15568195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LRTae: improving statistical power for genetic association with case/control data when phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors are present.
    Barral S; Haynes C; Stone M; Gordon D
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():24. PubMed ID: 16689984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cost-effective statistical method to correct for differential genotype misclassification when performing case-control genetic association.
    Londono D; Haynes C; De La Vega FM; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20606457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of exact tests for trend with binary endpoints using Bartholomew's statistic.
    Consiglio JD; Shan G; Wilding GE
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 25324456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
    Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochran-Armitage test versus logistic regression in the analysis of genetic association studies.
    Wellek S; Ziegler A
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 22212245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: power, sample size and robustness.
    Freidlin B; Zheng G; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 12145550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power and sample size calculations in the presence of phenotype errors for case/control genetic association studies.
    Edwards BJ; Haynes C; Levenstien MA; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    BMC Genet; 2005 Apr; 6():18. PubMed ID: 15819990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian sample size determination for case-control studies when exposure may be misclassified.
    Joseph L; Bélisle P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 178(11):1673-9. PubMed ID: 24036491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive two-stage analysis of genetic association in case-control designs.
    Zheng G; Song K; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 17310127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation program for power and sample size determination in logistic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms when the response variable is subject to misclassification.
    Yamada T; Kinukawa N; Nakamura T; Nose Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Oct; 96(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19403193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computing asymptotic power and sample size for case-control genetic association studies in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors.
    Ji F; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article37. PubMed ID: 16646856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.