These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2187986)
1. Research on the human conceptus and its regulation in Britain today. McLaren A J R Soc Med; 1990 Apr; 83(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 2187986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryo research: yes or no? Braude P; Johnson M BMJ; 1989 Dec; 299(6712):1349-51. PubMed ID: 2513957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IVF: regulation or prohibition? McLaren A Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):469-70. PubMed ID: 2586619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing minds about embryo research. Mulkay M Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryo research: the significance of the new law. Samuels A; Barrister JP Med Sci Law; 1991 Apr; 31(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 2062192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New insights into early embryos. Vines G New Sci; 1987 Jul; 115(1568):22-3. PubMed ID: 11655833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical and legal implications in IVF and prenatal diagnosis in the U.K. Ferguson-Smith ME Prenat Diagn; 1991 Aug; 11(8):661-70. PubMed ID: 1766938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why experiment on human embryos? Vines G New Sci; 1989 Nov; 124(1689):48-50. PubMed ID: 11659163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Warnock report. Warnock M Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6489):187-90. PubMed ID: 3926117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New conception threatened by old morality. Sattaur O New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):12-7. PubMed ID: 11658548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientists licensed to work on 'pre-embryos'. Connor S New Sci; 1985 Nov; 108(1483):21. PubMed ID: 11655727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Statutory Storage Period for Embryos) Regulations 1996 (S.I. 1996 No. 375). Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 11655139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. UK consults public on clones for research. Dickson D Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryo research--why the Cardinal is wrong. Walton J Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; 16(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 2287013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of embryo research: not as easy as it sounds. Annas GJ Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):138-40, 148. PubMed ID: 3645222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report. Gillon R Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical and legal issues in preimplantation genetic screening. Robertson JA Fertil Steril; 1992 Jan; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 1730301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]