These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21880246)

  • 1. Preanalytic and analytic accuracy: toward more realistic and meaningful self-monitoring of blood glucose submissions for regulatory approval.
    Cembrowski GS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1014-6. PubMed ID: 21880246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Evaluation of Two CE-Marked Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):934-5. PubMed ID: 25901021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the performance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system: why ease of use studies need to be part of accuracy studies.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Nov; 5(6):1610-1. PubMed ID: 22226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the CONTOUR® blood glucose monitoring system.
    Harrison B; Leazenby C; Halldorsdottir S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 21880245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent System Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Salzsieder E; Berg S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Sep; 10(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 26394775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Self-monitoring of blood glucose, as a means of self-management.
    Ikeda Y; Tsuruoka A
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1994 Oct; 24 Suppl():S269-71. PubMed ID: 7859617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring System Exceeds International Accuracy Standards.
    Brazg RL; Klaff LJ; Sussman AM
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1414-1415. PubMed ID: 27271844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 2nd Annual Symposium on Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Applications and Beyond, May 7-10, 2009, Berlin, Germany.
    Cuddihy R; Reach G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):539-49. PubMed ID: 19764833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [THE VERIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE MODELS OF GLUCOMETERS].
    Timofeev AV; Khaibulina ET; Mamonov RA; Gorst KA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2016 Jan; 61(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27183728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [CGM-Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Statement of the Austrian Diabetes Association (Update 2019)].
    Schütz-Fuhrmann I; Rami-Merhar B; Hofer SE; Fröhlich-Reiterer E; Mader J; Stadler M; Bischof M; Zlamal-Fortunat S; Laimer M; Weitgasser R
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2019 May; 131(Suppl 1):119-123. PubMed ID: 30980171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in Patient Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 10(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 26621051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system.
    Ji LN; Guo LX; Liu LB
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 54(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 26053011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The bottom line. Can portable blood glucose monitoring improve the outcomes of diabetic patients?
    Speicher CE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Feb; 95(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 1992604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the performance of the CONTOUR® TS Blood Glucose Monitoring System: when regulatory performance criteria are met, should we have confidence to use a medical device with all patients?
    Lyon ME; Lyon AW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):206-8. PubMed ID: 21303646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-oriented criteria for evaluation of self-monitoring of blood glucose devices.
    Church LB; Glauber HS
    Diabetes Care; 1989 Sep; 12(8):594-5. PubMed ID: 2776589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FDA approves new Glucose Monitoring System.
    Klonoff DC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(3):349. PubMed ID: 11475279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy Evaluation of an Integrated Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Improved Test Cassettes Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Baumstark A; Kraft M; Hattemer A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):242-4. PubMed ID: 26428935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Pleus S; Link M; Baumstark A; Schmid C; Högel J; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 26062008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance standards for continuous glucose monitors.
    Hayter PG; Sharma M; Dunka L; Stout P; Price DA; Horwitz DL; Marhoul J; Vaez-Zadeh S
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):721-6. PubMed ID: 16241875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation of measured values associated with different lots of sensors for the FreeStyle Libre.
    Okada J; Yamada E; Saito T; Okada S; Yamada M
    J Diabetes; 2018 Dec; 10(12):986-987. PubMed ID: 29968342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.