These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21880246)

  • 41. Analysis of GlucoMen®Day: a novel microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitor.
    Kubiak T
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1193-4. PubMed ID: 20920439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Link M; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1060-75. PubMed ID: 23063032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Diabetes: blood glucose monitoring.
    Burden M
    Nurs Times; 2001 Feb 22-28; 97(8):36-9. PubMed ID: 11954219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System According to EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Bright D; Dunseath G; Berti F; Scuffi C; Valgimigli F; Luzio S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):849-850. PubMed ID: 28745087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy Assessment of an Improved Version of an Established Blood Glucose Monitoring System for Self-Testing Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Kamecke U; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):851-853. PubMed ID: 28627219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of a novel continuous glucose measurement device in patients with diabetes mellitus across the glycemic range.
    Morrow L; Hompesch M; Tideman AM; Matson J; Dunne N; Pardo S; Parkes JL; Schachner HC; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 5(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 21880226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of the Nova Stat Strip® glucose meter for real-time blood glucose determinations during glucose clamp studies: "don't swap horses in midstream".
    Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 4(5):1202-4. PubMed ID: 20920441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Integrated self-monitoring of blood glucose system: handling step analysis.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Ruhland K; Baumstark A; Haug C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 22920822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Use of continuous glucose monitoring to improve diabetes mellitus management.
    Ellis SL; Bookout T; Garg SK; Izuora KE
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 2007 Dec; 36 Suppl 2():46-68. PubMed ID: 18407033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy Evaluation of a CE-Marked Glucometer System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Reagent Lots Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Hehmke B; Berg S; Salzsieder E
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):635-636. PubMed ID: 27707915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Analysis of an electrochemical blood glucose monitoring system with hematocrit compensation: improved accuracy by design.
    Lyon ME; Lyon AW
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 May; 6(3):656-8. PubMed ID: 22768897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy Evaluation of a New System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Three Test Strip Lots Based on ISO 15197:2013.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Pleus S; Liebing C; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Mar; 12(2):539-540. PubMed ID: 28931322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minimizing the impact of time lag variability on accuracy evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring systems.
    Scuffi C; Lucarelli F; Valgimigli F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 6(6):1383-91. PubMed ID: 23294784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Recent progress in biosensors: problems awaiting solutions for long-term clinical applications of glucose sensor].
    Shichiri M; Fukushima H; Sakakida M; Kajiwara K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1991 Feb; 49 Suppl():553-62. PubMed ID: 2033850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Unlocking the potential of continuous glucose monitoring: a new guideline supports the development of continuous glucose monitoring devices.
    D'Archangelo MJ
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2009 Mar; 3(2):363-5. PubMed ID: 20144368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Flash glucose monitoring-using technology to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes.
    Weiss J; Cohen N; Zajac JD; Ekinci EI
    Aust J Rural Health; 2018 Dec; 26(6):453-454. PubMed ID: 30450604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy evaluation of two systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197.
    Wang Y
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 8(6):1243-4. PubMed ID: 25155844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies.
    Laffel L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S223-33. PubMed ID: 26784126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).
    Bailey TS; Klaff LJ; Wallace JF; Greene C; Pardo S; Harrison B; Simmons DA
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):872-5. PubMed ID: 26902794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
    Vanterpool GE
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):995-6. PubMed ID: 26892507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.