324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21880667)
1. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biotechnology. EPA proposal would exempt some GMOs from registry.
Reardon S
Science; 2011 May; 332(6030):652. PubMed ID: 21551040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
Gurian-Sherman D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. GM grass eludes outmoded USDA oversight.
Waltz E
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Sep; 29(9):772-3. PubMed ID: 21904303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Gaps, inexperience, inconsistencies, and overlaps: crisis in the regulation of genetically modified plants and animals.
Mandal GN
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Apr; 45(5):2167-259. PubMed ID: 16329219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
Marris E
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
McHughen A
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars.
McHughen A; Smyth S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Jan; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 17956539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental regulation. U.S. courts say transgenic crops need tighter scrutiny.
Charles D
Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5815):1069. PubMed ID: 17322039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Agbiotech. USDA decides against new regulation of GM crops.
Stokstad E
Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6017):523. PubMed ID: 21292947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Environment regulations hinder biotech industry.
Miller HI
Nature; 2000 Aug; 406(6796):560. PubMed ID: 10949276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trace and traceability--a call for regulatory harmony.
Ramessar K; Capell T; Twyman RM; Quemada H; Christou P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):975-8. PubMed ID: 18779799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
Kuzma J
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):165-7. PubMed ID: 26961641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liberty Link rice raises specter of tightened regulations.
Vermij P
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1301-2. PubMed ID: 17093456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution.
Hoffman DE
Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Playing catch-up.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jun; 22(6):637. PubMed ID: 15175666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
