141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2188130)
1. Congress moves to regulate self-referral and physicians' ownership of clinical laboratories.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1990 Jun; 322(23):1682-7. PubMed ID: 2188130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stark introduces new anti-referral legislation.
Lindeke JM
Health Syst Rev; 1993; 26(2):44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10171385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Efforts to address the problem of physician self-referral.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1820-4. PubMed ID: 1944492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nuclear options: why there will be a fire sale on nuclear imaging equipment in 2006.
Wright W
Tenn Med; 2006 Sep; 99(9):31-2. PubMed ID: 17225778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Joint ventures become even riskier.
Azevedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jul; 70(14):36-8, 41, 44-5. PubMed ID: 10127361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stark self-referral rules burdened with complexities.
Barratt K; Katayama A
Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):697-701. PubMed ID: 8571621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physicians and change: what to expect in 1992.
Doherty RB
Internist; 1992 Feb; 33(2):26-9. PubMed ID: 10118319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safe harbors for toy boats: an analysis and commentary.
Peregrine MW; Waller AA; Glaser DL
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Oct; 24(10):297-310, 319, 328. PubMed ID: 10114556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stark reality.
Flanagan EM; Thiel DK
Health Prog; 1990 Apr; 71(3):70-4. PubMed ID: 10106618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician self-referral: empirical evidence and policy implications.
Mitchell JM; Scott E
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1992; 13():27-42. PubMed ID: 10171713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congress, Bush wrangle over cost of Medicare.
Cooper L; Neumann M
Nephrol News Issues; 2002 Apr; 16(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 11962143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hanlester Laboratories decision: important test of antikickback statute.
Tully WB
Healthspan; 1991 Apr; 8(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 10110667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician ownership of health care ventures. A federal update.
Valiant C; Robey PE
Group Pract J; 1989; 38(1):4-5, 10. PubMed ID: 10303283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician self-referrals: Stark pushing total ban on physician ownership and self-referral deals.
Margolis RE
Healthspan; 1993 May; 10(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 10127750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The debate over physician ownership of health care facilities.
Iglehart JK
N Engl J Med; 1989 Jul; 321(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 2664511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Financial conflicts of interest in physicians' relationships with the pharmaceutical industry--self-regulation in the shadow of federal prosecution.
Studdert DM; Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(18):1891-900. PubMed ID: 15509824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare and Medicaid anti-kickback law.
Vaughn TD
Mo Dent J; 1993; 73(3):11-3. PubMed ID: 8361363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A primer on the legal pitfalls of physician ownership and self-referral practices.
Steiner JE; Wagner MJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Sep; 25(9):257-64. PubMed ID: 10123300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. SmithKline settles charges of kickbacks at 3 labs.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):3. PubMed ID: 10304218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
