These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21882129)

  • 1. [Reading and interpreting meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies].
    Schueler S; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):799-803. PubMed ID: 21882129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
    Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analysis as the core of evidence-based behavioral medicine: tools and pitfalls of a statistical approach.
    Nestoriuc Y; Kriston L; Rief W
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 23(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 20084004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
    Vamvakas EC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A systematic guide for reading and interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies].
    Panner J; Schuetz GM; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):909-12. PubMed ID: 21972042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How to develop evidence-based ophthalmology].
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 15268842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Khan KS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
    Rücker G; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: a review of the basic principles of interpretation and application.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Skapinakis P; Arora S; Darzi A; Dimopoulos K; Athanasiou T
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 140(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 19592119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--critical appraisal of diagnostic literature.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 19480899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
    Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based radiology: step 5--evaluate.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):182-3. PubMed ID: 19480903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic imaging in oncology--evidence reviews for evidence based guidelines by the Agency of Quality for Medicine (ÄZQ)].
    Nothacker M; Langer T; Weinbrenner S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2010; 104(7):554-62. PubMed ID: 21095608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis: review of an important tool in radiological research and decision making.
    Jones CM; Athanasiou T
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):441-6. PubMed ID: 19451313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs--a practical guide.
    Ried K
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Aug; 35(8):635-8. PubMed ID: 16894442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders.
    Bussières AE; Taylor JA; Peterson C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jan; 31(1):33-88. PubMed ID: 18308153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic imaging guideline for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 2: upper extremity disorders.
    Bussières AE; Peterson C; Taylor JA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jan; 31(1):2-32. PubMed ID: 18308152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.