These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21882129)

  • 21. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders.
    Bussières AE; Taylor JA; Peterson C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Jan; 31(1):33-88. PubMed ID: 18308153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A meta-analytic approach to determine the state of the science on implant dentistry.
    Proskin HM; Jeffcoat RL; Catlin A; Campbell J; Jeffcoat MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():11-8. PubMed ID: 18437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Random-effects models for diagnostic accuracy data.
    Gatsonis CA
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S14-21; discussion S57-67, S61-4 pa. PubMed ID: 9419701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interpretation of diagnostic tests: diagnostic accuracy efficacy and effectiveness.
    Stolberg HO; Nahmias C; Trop I
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Feb; 54(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12625079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--primary literature validity (critical appraisal).
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 19480898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Systematic reviews of studies of diagnostic test accuracy].
    Moreno G G; Pantoja C T
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Feb; 137(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 19543656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
    Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
    Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Random-effects models in the receiver operating characteristic curve-based assessment of the effectiveness of diagnostic imaging technology: concepts, approaches, and issues.
    Beam CA
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2 Suppl 1():S4-13; discussion S57-60, S68-9 pas. PubMed ID: 9419700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bigby M; Williams H
    Arch Dermatol; 2003 Jun; 139(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 12810513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evidence-based medicine 1998 (II)].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 1998 Mar; 48(6):651-2. PubMed ID: 9781137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence-based radiology: step 4--apply.
    Cronin P
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 19480902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine.
    Broeze KA; Opmeer BC; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Bhattacharya S; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 20819831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterizing the performance of diagnostic imaging systems.
    Lopez H
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Jul; 2(7):634-7. PubMed ID: 9419616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Critical reading of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about diagnostic imaging].
    Plana MN; Zamora J; Abraira V
    Radiologia; 2015 Nov; 57 Suppl 2():23-30. PubMed ID: 26071664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis methods for diagnostic accuracy.
    Begg CB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1081-2; discussion 1083-4. PubMed ID: 19208369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identifying null meta-analyses that are ripe for updating.
    Barrowman NJ; Fang M; Sampson M; Moher D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():13. PubMed ID: 12877755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Heterogeneity can impair the results of Cochrane meta-analyses despite accordance with statistical guidelines.
    Malling HJ; Thomsen AB; Andersen JS
    Allergy; 2008 Dec; 63(12):1643-5. PubMed ID: 19032241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.