BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21882763)

  • 1. A new reflex testing algorithm for syphilis screening.
    Cornish N
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Jun; 43(6):40-1. PubMed ID: 21882763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of a syphilis testing algorithm using a treponemal test for screening].
    Ozbek OA; Doğan Y
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 21341164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the serodia Treponema pallidum particle agglutination, the Murex Syphilis ICE and the Enzywell TP tests for serodiagnosis of syphilis.
    Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S
    Int J STD AIDS; 2005 Apr; 16(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15899082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: comparison of the Trep-Chek IgG enzyme immunoassay with other screening and confirmatory tests.
    Tsang RS; Martin IE; Lau A; Sawatzky P
    FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 51(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 17854473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis--treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter?
    Owusu-Edusei K; Koski KA; Ballard RC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 May; 38(5):448-56. PubMed ID: 21183862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness of enzyme immunoassay and immunoblot testing for the diagnosis of syphilis.
    Chuck A; Ohinmaa A; Tilley P; Singh A; Jacobs P
    Int J STD AIDS; 2008 Jun; 19(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18595877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening--four laboratories, New York City, 2005-2006.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Aug; 57(32):872-5. PubMed ID: 18701877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms.
    Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for syphilis--rational use and interpretation.
    Nadarajah M
    Singapore Med J; 1990 Aug; 31(4):381-3. PubMed ID: 2255939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test for detection of antibodies (immunoglobulins G and M) to Treponema pallidum in serologic diagnosis of syphilis.
    Aktas G; Young H; Moyes A; Badur S
    Int J STD AIDS; 2007 Apr; 18(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 17509177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative syphilis treponemal enzyme immunoassay results in an HIV-infected case-patient.
    Katz AR; Komeya AY; Tomas JE
    Int J STD AIDS; 2017 Jun; 28(7):735-737. PubMed ID: 27956647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Syphilis diagnosis: screening by enzyme immunoassay and variation in fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) confirmatory test performance.
    Chronas G; Moyes A; Young H
    Med Lab Sci; 1992 Mar; 49(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 1453909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis?
    Binnicker MJ
    Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2012 Feb; 25(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 22156894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies (MHA-TP), a new treponemal test for syphilis: where does it fit?
    Rudolph AH
    J Am Vener Dis Assoc; 1976 Sep; 3(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 795798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: a comparison of different diagnostic methods.
    Simčič S; Potočnik M
    Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat; 2015; 24(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 26086162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management.
    Tong ML; Lin LR; Liu LL; Zhang HL; Huang SJ; Chen YY; Guo XJ; Xi Y; Liu L; Chen FY; Zhang YF; Zhang Q; Yang TC
    Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Apr; 58(8):1116-24. PubMed ID: 24550376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing three treponemal tests for syphilis screening.
    Buono SA; Godwin HA; Green NM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 Nov; 89(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 28844341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of the anti-TP antibody latex agglutination immunoassay in routine testing and a clinical viewpoint].
    Fujimori C; Yukimasa N; Miura K; Mochizuki S; Yasuhara T; Takagi Y; Gomi K
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Mar; 57(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 19363990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Immulite 2000 Syphilis screen assay in syphilis screening].
    Sampedro A; Padilla A; Aliaga L; Sánchez J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2011 Feb; 29(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 21334111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening and Discordant Results in Pregnancy.
    Williams JEP; Bazan JA; Turner AN; Thung SF; Hanlon C; Pettus TR; Sánchez PJ
    J Pediatr; 2020 Apr; 219():263-266.e1. PubMed ID: 32093931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.