BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21882969)

  • 1. Developing a regional recovery framework.
    Lesperance AM; Olson J; Stein S; Clark R; Kelly H; Sheline J; Tietje G; Williamson M; Woodcock J
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 21882969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interagency Biological Restoration Demonstration (IBRD): a collaborative approach to biological incident recovery.
    Crockett K
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 21882966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in disposing of anthrax waste.
    Lesperance AM; Stein S; Upton JF; Toomey C
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):310-4. PubMed ID: 21882972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The national framework and consequence management guidance following a biological attack.
    Raber E; Hibbard WJ; Greenwalt R
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 21882968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of determining the need for remediation following a wide-area biological release.
    Raber E
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 21882967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biological decontamination process for small, privately owned buildings.
    Krauter P; Tucker M
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 21882971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to biological incidents--what are the current issues in remediation of the contaminated environment?
    Pottage T; Goode E; Wyke S; Bennett AM
    Environ Int; 2014 Nov; 72():133-9. PubMed ID: 24530001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic methodology for selecting decontamination strategies following a biocontamination event.
    Krauter P; Edwards D; Yang L; Tucker M
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 21823924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of waste management issues arising from a field study evaluating decontamination of a biological agent from a building.
    Lemieux P; Wood J; Drake J; Minamyer S; Silvestri E; Yund C; Nichols T; Ierardi M; Amidan B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 26479121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preparedness for an anthrax attack.
    Franz DR
    Mol Aspects Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 19619577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public response to an anthrax attack: reactions to mass prophylaxis in a scenario involving inhalation anthrax from an unidentified source.
    SteelFisher G; Blendon R; Ross LJ; Collins BC; Ben-Porath EN; Bekheit MM; Mailhot JR
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2011 Sep; 9(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 21819225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental decontamination following a large-scale bioterrorism attack: federal progress and remaining gaps.
    Franco C; Bouri N
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2010 Jun; 8(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 20367575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decontamination after a release of B. anthracis spores.
    Campbell CG; Kirvel RD; Love AH; Bailey CG; Miles R; Schweickert J; Sutton M; Raber E
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Mar; 10(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 22352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposed framework for cleanup and site restoration following a terrorist incident involving radioactive material.
    Conklin WC
    Health Phys; 2005 Nov; 89(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 16217201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional collaboration among Urban Area Security Initiative regions: results of the Johns Hopkins urban area survey.
    Errett NA; Bowman C; Barnett DJ; Resnick BA; Frattaroli S; Rutkow L
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2014; 12(6):356-65. PubMed ID: 25398073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interlocal collaboration and emergency preparedness: a qualitative analysis of the impact of the Urban Area Security Initiative program.
    Errett NA; Frattaroli S; Resnick BA; Barnett DJ; Rutkow L
    Am J Disaster Med; 2014; 9(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 25672332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness comparison of response strategies to a large-scale anthrax attack on the chicago metropolitan area: impact of timing and surge capacity.
    Kyriacou DN; Dobrez D; Parada JP; Steinberg JM; Kahn A; Bennett CL; Schmitt BP
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Sep; 10(3):264-79. PubMed ID: 22845046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collaboration between public health and law enforcement: new paradigms and partnerships for bioterrorism planning and response.
    Butler JC; Cohen ML; Friedman CR; Scripp RM; Watz CG
    Emerg Infect Dis; 2002 Oct; 8(10):1152-6. PubMed ID: 12396931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioterrorism alleging use of anthrax and interim guidelines for management--United States, 1998.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1999 Feb; 48(4):69-74. PubMed ID: 10023627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False alarms, real challenges--one university's communication response to the 2001 anthrax crisis.
    Clarke CE; Chess C
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2006; 4(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 16545026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.