121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21883331)
1. Does fairness matter in the context of anger about nuclear energy decision making?
Besley JC
Risk Anal; 2012 Jan; 32(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 21883331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients.
Heuer L; Penrod S; Kattan A
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Dec; 31(6):573-610. PubMed ID: 17245632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
McComas KA; Besley JC
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
De Cremer D; Tyler TR
J Appl Psychol; 2007 May; 92(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 17484547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential roles of fairness- and compassion-based motivations for cooperation, defection, and punishment.
Singer T; Steinbeis N
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1167():41-50. PubMed ID: 19580551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge.
See KE
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 19210067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness.
van den Bos K
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jun; 80(6):931-41. PubMed ID: 11414375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How we became the Schmams: conceptualizations of fairness in the decision-making process for Latina/o children.
Langhout RD; Kohfeldt DM; Ellison ER
Am J Community Psychol; 2011 Dec; 48(3-4):296-308. PubMed ID: 21103924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.
Foglia MB; Pearlman RA; Bottrell MM; Altemose JA; Fox E
Organ Ethic; 2008; 4(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 18839751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and judgments of an authority's responsibility.
Brockner J; Fishman AY; Reb J; Goldman B; Spiegel S; Garden C
J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1657-71. PubMed ID: 18020803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individuals' willingness to talk to their doctors about clinical trial enrollment.
McComas KA; Yang Z; Gay GK; Leonard JP; Dannenberg AJ; Dillon H
J Health Commun; 2010 Mar; 15(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 20390986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation.
De Cremer D; Cornelis I; Van Hiel A
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Feb; 148(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 18476483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.
Knoch D; Pascual-Leone A; Meyer K; Treyer V; Fehr E
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):829-32. PubMed ID: 17023614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Procedural justice and status: status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects.
van Prooijen JW; van den Bos K; Wilke HA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 12500817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Balancing emotion and cognition: a case for decision aiding in conservation efforts.
Wilson RS
Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 18717697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Withholding inputs in team contexts: member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing.
Price KH; Harrison DA; Gavin JH
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(6):1375-84. PubMed ID: 17100491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Procedural justice as autonomy regulation.
van Prooijen JW
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1166-80. PubMed ID: 19469594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.
Leung K; Tong KK; Lind EA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(3):476-89. PubMed ID: 17352604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice in political decision-making: the effect of group voice on perceived trustworthiness of decision makers and subsequent acceptance of decisions.
Terwel BW; Harinck F; Ellemers N; Daamen DD
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 20565202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
