128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21883428)
1. Miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis of diabetes in primary care.
de Lusignan S; Sadek N; Mulnier H; Tahir A; Russell-Jones D; Khunti K
Diabet Med; 2012 Feb; 29(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 21883428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method of identifying and correcting miscoding, misclassification and misdiagnosis in diabetes: a pilot and validation study of routinely collected data.
de Lusignan S; Khunti K; Belsey J; Hattersley A; van Vlymen J; Gallagher H; Millett C; Hague NJ; Tomson C; Harris K; Majeed A
Diabet Med; 2010 Feb; 27(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 20546265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating tools to support a new practical classification of diabetes: excellent control may represent misdiagnosis and omission from disease registers is associated with worse control.
Hassan Sadek N; Sadek AR; Tahir A; Khunti K; Desombre T; de Lusignan S
Int J Clin Pract; 2012 Sep; 66(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 22784308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence and characteristics in coding, classification and diagnosis of diabetes in primary care.
Seidu S; Davies MJ; Mostafa S; de Lusignan S; Khunti K
Postgrad Med J; 2014 Jan; 90(1059):13-7. PubMed ID: 24225940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated identification of miscoded and misclassified cases of diabetes from computer records.
Sadek AR; van Vlymen J; Khunti K; de Lusignan S
Diabet Med; 2012 Mar; 29(3):410-4. PubMed ID: 21916978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the quality of care of diabetic population at a health center].
Buitrago Ramírez F; Vegas Jiménez T; Poblador Curto MD
Aten Primaria; 1989 May; 6 Spec No():38-9, 42-4. PubMed ID: 2519000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and impact of initial misclassification of pediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Tripathi A; Rizvi AA; Knight LM; Jerrell JM
South Med J; 2012 Oct; 105(10):513-7. PubMed ID: 23038480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorrect and incomplete coding and classification of diabetes: a systematic review.
Stone MA; Camosso-Stefinovic J; Wilkinson J; de Lusignan S; Hattersley AT; Khunti K
Diabet Med; 2010 May; 27(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 20536944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is diabetes mellitus correctly registered and classified in primary care? A population-based study in Catalonia, Spain.
Mata-Cases M; Mauricio D; Real J; Bolíbar B; Franch-Nadal J
Endocrinol Nutr; 2016 Nov; 63(9):440-448. PubMed ID: 27613079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of recording of diabetes in the UK: how does the GP's method of coding clinical data affect incidence estimates? Cross-sectional study using the CPRD database.
Tate AR; Dungey S; Glew S; Beloff N; Williams R; Williams T
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012905. PubMed ID: 28122831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glucose test provenance recording in UK primary care: was that fasted or random?
McGovern AP; Fieldhouse H; Tippu Z; Jones S; Munro N; de Lusignan S
Diabet Med; 2017 Jan; 34(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 26773331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality of diabetes care: a comparison between patients enrolled and not enrolled on a regional diabetes register.
Coppell KJ; Anderson K; Williams SM; Lamb C; Farmer VL; Mann JI
Prim Care Diabetes; 2011 Jul; 5(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 21126933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [New diagnostic methods and classification of diabetes. Not many changes--but why?].
Groop L
Nord Med; 1998 Dec; 113(10):331-4. PubMed ID: 9894408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical and psychological outcomes for young adults with Type 1 diabetes: no improvement despite recent advances in diabetes care.
Johnson B; Elliott J; Scott A; Heller S; Eiser C
Diabet Med; 2014 Feb; 31(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 23952498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.
Klompas M; Eggleston E; McVetta J; Lazarus R; Li L; Platt R
Diabetes Care; 2013 Apr; 36(4):914-21. PubMed ID: 23193215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New criteria for the detection, diagnosis, and classification of diabetes mellitus.
Wood ME
Nurse Pract Forum; 1998 Jun; 9(2):38-41. PubMed ID: 9752115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.
Zhong VW; Pfaff ER; Beavers DP; Thomas J; Jaacks LM; Bowlby DA; Carey TS; Lawrence JM; Dabelea D; Hamman RF; Pihoker C; Saydah SH; Mayer-Davis EJ;
Pediatr Diabetes; 2014 Dec; 15(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 24913103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical audit of diabetes mellitus in primary care setting in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Novo A; Jokić I
Croat Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 19090600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting misdiagnosed adult-onset type 1 diabetes using machine learning.
Cheheltani R; King N; Lee S; North B; Kovarik D; Evans-Molina C; Leavitt N; Dutta S
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 191():110029. PubMed ID: 35940302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Early detection of diabetes in visitors to a health fair according to new definition of diabetes].
Breidert M; Schmoeckel A; Nettesheim O; Hanefeld M
Gesundheitswesen; 1998 Oct; 60(10):572-5. PubMed ID: 9844292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
