BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21883632)

  • 1. A technique for repairing a loosening abutment screw for a cement-retained implant prosthesis.
    Patil PG
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Dec; 20(8):652-5. PubMed ID: 21883632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional location of the retaining screw axis for a cemented single tooth implant restoration.
    Wicks R; Shintaku WH; Johnson A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 21(6):491-3. PubMed ID: 22823426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations.
    Nissan J; Narobai D; Gross O; Ghelfan O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1102-7. PubMed ID: 22010095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening.
    Assenza B; Scarano A; Leghissa G; Carusi G; Thams U; Roman FS; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 16265854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
    Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acrylic resin guide for locating the abutment screw access channel of cement-retained implant prostheses.
    Ahmed A; Maroulakos G; Garaicoa J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):560-3. PubMed ID: 26794698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations].
    Harel N; Livne S; Piek D; Marku-Cohen S; Ormianer Z
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):19-25, 63. PubMed ID: 22991873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design.
    Preiskel HW; Tsolka P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 14982360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained multiunit implant restoration.
    Uludag B; Celik G
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):248-50. PubMed ID: 17069169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simple device for locating the abutment screw position of a cement-retained implant restoration.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 23566610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Drago CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 12705307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.