1190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21883774)
1. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare
Rödter TH; Knippschild S; Baulig C; Krummenauer F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 31466475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.
Lee TE; Yoo C; Hwang JY; Lin S; Kim YY
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Sep; 40(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 25271991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients' feasibility and acceptability.
Cvenkel B; Velkovska MA; Jordanova VD
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 30632407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL.
Barkana Y; Gutfreund S
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(7):608-14. PubMed ID: 24299102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Icare versus Goldmann in a randomised middle-aged population : The influence of central corneal thickness and refractive errors.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Ohtonen P; Liinamaa MJ; Saarela V
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 31(3):1231-1239. PubMed ID: 32517497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer.
Shah MA; Bin Saleem K; Mehmood T
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(3-4):21-4. PubMed ID: 24669600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T
Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening.
Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
