These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21883774)

  • 1. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
    Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare
    Rödter TH; Knippschild S; Baulig C; Krummenauer F
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 31466475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.
    Lee TE; Yoo C; Hwang JY; Lin S; Kim YY
    Curr Eye Res; 2015 Sep; 40(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 25271991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM; Ogbuehi KC
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
    Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
    Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients' feasibility and acceptability.
    Cvenkel B; Velkovska MA; Jordanova VD
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 30632407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL.
    Barkana Y; Gutfreund S
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014; 42(7):608-14. PubMed ID: 24299102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Icare versus Goldmann in a randomised middle-aged population : The influence of central corneal thickness and refractive errors.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Ohtonen P; Liinamaa MJ; Saarela V
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 31(3):1231-1239. PubMed ID: 32517497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular pressure measurement: Goldmann Applanation Tonometer vs non contact airpuff tonometer.
    Shah MA; Bin Saleem K; Mehmood T
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2012; 24(3-4):21-4. PubMed ID: 24669600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
    Subramaniam AG; Allen P; Toh T
    Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening.
    Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 60.