173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21884213)
1. Observer prediction of HER2 amplification in HercepTest 2+ breast cancers as a potential audit instrument.
Going JJ
Histopathology; 2011 Aug; 59(2):333-5. PubMed ID: 21884213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?
Barrett C; Magee H; O'Toole D; Daly S; Jeffers M
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 16822876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HER2 status in breast cancer determined by IHC and FISH: comparison of the results.
Mrozkowiak A; Olszewski WP; Piaścik A; Olszewski WT
Pol J Pathol; 2004; 55(4):165-71. PubMed ID: 15757204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HER2-testing in 538 consecutive breast cancer cases using FISH and immunohistochemistry.
Kovács A; Stenman G
Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jan; 206(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 19819642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IHC for Her2 with CBE356 antibody is a more accurate predictor of Her2 gene amplification by FISH than HercepTest in breast carcinoma.
Ainsworth R; Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Forsyth A; Richmond J; Angerson W; Watters A; Dunne B
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1086-90. PubMed ID: 16189156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromogenic in situ hybridisation testing for HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer produces highly reproducible results concordant with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry.
Bilous M; Morey A; Armes J; Cummings M; Francis G
Pathology; 2006 Apr; 38(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 16581651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining true HER2 gene status in breast cancers with polysomy by using alternative chromosome 17 reference genes: implications for anti-HER2 targeted therapy.
Tse CH; Hwang HC; Goldstein LC; Kandalaft PL; Wiley JC; Kussick SJ; Gown AM
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Nov; 29(31):4168-74. PubMed ID: 21947821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological tumor grade correlates with HER2/c-erB-2 status in invasive breast cancer: a comparative analysis between immunohistochemical (CB11 clone and Herceptest), FISH and differential PCR procedures.
López-Guerrero JA; Navarro S; Noguera R; Almenar S; Pellin A; Vázquez C; Llombart-Bosch A
Arkh Patol; 2003; 65(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12669615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New cutpoints to identify increased HER2 copy number: analysis of a large, population-based cohort with long-term follow-up.
Jensen KC; Turbin DA; Leung S; Miller MA; Johnson K; Norris B; Hastie T; McKinney S; Nielsen TO; Huntsman DG; Gilks CB; West RB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 18193353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for determining HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Kammori M; Kurabayashi R; Kashio M; Sakamoto A; Yoshimoto M; Amano S; Kaminishi M; Yamada T; Takubo K
Oncol Rep; 2008 Mar; 19(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 18288397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer.
Bartlett JM; Going JJ; Mallon EA; Watters AD; Reeves JR; Stanton P; Richmond J; Donald B; Ferrier R; Cooke TG
J Pathol; 2001 Nov; 195(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 11745673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HER2 amplification status in breast cancer: a comparison between immunohistochemical staining and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using manual and automated quantitative image analysis scoring techniques.
Ellis CM; Dyson MJ; Stephenson TJ; Maltby EL
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 58(7):710-4. PubMed ID: 15976337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer HER2 equivocal cases: is there an alternative to FISH testing? A pilot study using two different antibodies sequentially.
Yosepovich A; Avivi C; Bar J; Polak-Charcon S; Mardoukh C; Barshack I
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 20928989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization assessment for HER-2/neu status in Taiwanese breast cancer patients.
Kuo SJ; Wang BB; Chang CS; Chen TH; Yeh KT; Lee DJ; Yin PL; Chen M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 46(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17638622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HER2 assessment by immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization: comparison of HercepTest and PathVysion commercial assays.
McCormick SR; Lillemoe TJ; Beneke J; Schrauth J; Reinartz J
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jun; 117(6):935-43. PubMed ID: 12047146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HER-2 gene amplification, HER-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein expression, and lapatinib efficacy in women with metastatic breast cancer.
Press MF; Finn RS; Cameron D; Di Leo A; Geyer CE; Villalobos IE; Santiago A; Guzman R; Gasparyan A; Ma Y; Danenberg K; Martin AM; Williams L; Oliva C; Stein S; Gagnon R; Arbushites M; Koehler MT
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Dec; 14(23):7861-70. PubMed ID: 19047115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of HER2 gene status in breast cancer by chromogenic in situ hybridization: comparison with immunohistochemistry.
Kounelis S; Kapranos N; Malamos N; Kouri-Bairaktari E
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(2A):939-46. PubMed ID: 15868931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between pathological features, HER2 protein expression and HER2 and CEP17 copy number in breast cancer: biological and methodological considerations.
Lambein K; Praet M; Forsyth R; Van den Broecke R; Braems G; Matthys B; Cocquyt V; Denys H; Pauwels P; Libbrecht L
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 21177747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to predict benefit from dose escalation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients.
Dressler LG; Berry DA; Broadwater G; Cowan D; Cox K; Griffin S; Miller A; Tse J; Novotny D; Persons DL; Barcos M; Henderson IC; Liu ET; Thor A; Budman D; Muss H; Norton L; Hayes DF
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jul; 23(19):4287-97. PubMed ID: 15994142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
