108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21884821)
41. Coordinated conditional simulation with SLINK and SUP of many markers linked or associated to a trait in large pedigrees.
Schäffer AA; Lemire M; Ott J; Lathrop GM; Weeks DE
Hum Hered; 2011; 71(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 21734403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Madeline 2.0 PDE: a new program for local and web-based pedigree drawing.
Trager EH; Khanna R; Marrs A; Siden L; Branham KE; Swaroop A; Richards JE
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(14):1854-6. PubMed ID: 17488757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Conditional genealogies and the age of a neutral mutant.
Wiuf C; Donnelly P
Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Oct; 56(2):183-201. PubMed ID: 10544068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Historical reconstitution of Varaita Valley population 1770-1970.
Lucchetti E
Acta Anthropogenet; 1981; 5(4):255-70. PubMed ID: 6753869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A software tool of digital tomosynthesis application for patient positioning in radiotherapy.
Yan H; Dai JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):174-193. PubMed ID: 27074482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genetic genealogy comes of age: perspectives on the use of deep-rooted pedigrees in human population genetics.
Larmuseau MH; Van Geystelen A; van Oven M; Decorte R
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Apr; 150(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 23440589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A software tool for the graphical visualization of large and complex populations.
Garbe JR; Da Y
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2003 Dec; 30(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 14986440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Modified SIMPSON O(n3) algorithm for the full sibship reconstruction problem.
Konovalov DA; Bajema N; Litow B
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3912-7. PubMed ID: 16118259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Softwares and methods for estimating genetic ancestry in human populations.
Liu Y; Nyunoya T; Leng S; Belinsky SA; Tesfaigzi Y; Bruse S
Hum Genomics; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 23289408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Association mapping and significance estimation via the coalescent.
Kimmel G; Karp RM; Jordan MI; Halperin E
Am J Hum Genet; 2008 Dec; 83(6):675-83. PubMed ID: 19026399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees.
Riester M; Stadler PF; Klemm K
Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2134-9. PubMed ID: 19202194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reconstructing the genealogy of a BRCA1 founder mutation by phylogenetic analysis.
Marroni F; Cipollini G; Peissel B; D'Andrea E; Pensabene M; Radice P; Caligo MA; Presciuttini S; Bevilacqua G
Ann Hum Genet; 2008 May; 72(Pt 3):310-8. PubMed ID: 18215206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. PedStr software for cutting large pedigrees for haplotyping, IBD computation and multipoint linkage analysis.
Kirichenko AV; Belonogova NM; Aulchenko YS; Axenovich TI
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Sep; 73(Pt 5):527-31. PubMed ID: 19604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A linear-time algorithm for reconstructing zero-recombinant haplotype configuration on a pedigree.
Lai EY; Wang WB; Jiang T; Wu KP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 17(Suppl 17):S19. PubMed ID: 23281626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparing record linkage software programs and algorithms using real-world data.
Karr AF; Taylor MT; West SL; Setoguchi S; Kou TD; Gerhard T; Horton DB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0221459. PubMed ID: 31550255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fast and Accurate Shared Segment Detection and Relatedness Estimation in Un-phased Genetic Data via TRUFFLE.
Dimitromanolakis A; Paterson AD; Sun L
Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Jul; 105(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 31178127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. sim1000G: a user-friendly genetic variant simulator in R for unrelated individuals and family-based designs.
Dimitromanolakis A; Xu J; Krol A; Briollais L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 30646839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Evaluation of computational methods for HLA three loci haplotype by compare with family-based data].
Tang MZ; Li J; Cai YL; Zheng YM; Liao J; Zeng H; O'Brien S; Zeng Y
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 23189847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. When genetics and genealogies tell different stories-maternal lineages in Gaspesia.
Moreau C; Vézina H; Jomphe M; Lavoie EM; Roy-Gagnon MH; Labuda D
Ann Hum Genet; 2011 Mar; 75(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 21058944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Algorithms for Pedigree Comparison.
Chen ZZ; Feng Q; Shen C; Wang J; Wang L
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(2):422-431. PubMed ID: 27076461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
