BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21885220)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison I. Generalisation to the comparison of a mark with set of ten prints from a suspect.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):101-5. PubMed ID: 20965673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the ridge pattern: multi-informative analysis of latent fingermarks by MALDI mass spectrometry.
    Francese S; Bradshaw R; Ferguson LS; Wolstenholme R; Clench MR; Bleay S
    Analyst; 2013 Aug; 138(15):4215-28. PubMed ID: 23658933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: a field study.
    Neumann C; Mateos-Garcia I; Langenburg G; Kostroski J; Skerrett JE; Koolen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):32-46. PubMed ID: 21640531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
    Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From template to image: reconstructing fingerprints from minutiae points.
    Ross A; Shah J; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Apr; 29(4):544-60. PubMed ID: 17299213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biological variability of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population.
    Gutiérrez E; Galera V; Martínez JM; Alonso C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):98-105. PubMed ID: 17289319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fingermark age determinations: Legal considerations, review of the literature and practical propositions.
    Girod A; Ramotowski R; Lambrechts S; Misrielal P; Aalders M; Weyermann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():212-26. PubMed ID: 27044033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
    Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Hicks T; Biedermann A; de Koeijer JA; Taroni F; Champod C; Evett IW
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26654089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faux Blood Fingermark on Pistol: Latent Fingerprint Developed by Whole Blood.
    Lin S; Luo Y; Xie L; Yu Y; Mi Z
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Nov; 64(6):1913-1915. PubMed ID: 31283022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latent palmprint matching.
    Jain AK; Feng J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Jun; 31(6):1032-47. PubMed ID: 19372608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fingerprint pattern restoration by digital image processing techniques.
    Wen CY; Yu CC
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):973-84. PubMed ID: 14535661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.