These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21886337)

  • 21. Money, sex, and religion--the Supreme Court's ACA sequel.
    Annas GJ; Ruger TW; Ruger JP
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Aug; 371(9):862-6. PubMed ID: 25029337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can Congress make you buy broccoli? And why that's a hard question.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ; Glantz LH
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Jan; 364(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 21175307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The constitutionality of the individual mandate.
    Mariner WK; Balkin JM; Somin I
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Oct; 365(17):e36. PubMed ID: 22030004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The June surprises: balls, strikes, and the fog of war.
    Fried C
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2013 Apr; 38(2):225-41. PubMed ID: 23262769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can Congress regulate "inactivity" (and make Americans buy health insurance)?
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Mar; 364(9):e17. PubMed ID: 21323534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exemption from ACA contraception requirement. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 2014 WL 2921709, (2014).
    Benefits Q; 2014; 30(3):43. PubMed ID: 25509676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. AFTER COURT. Will Supreme Court ruling impact insurance pricing, Medicaid expansion?
    Stempniak M
    Hosp Health Netw; 2015 Jul; 89(7):16. PubMed ID: 26793907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Affordable Care Act litigation: the Supreme Court and the future of health care reform.
    Gostin LO; Garcia KK
    JAMA; 2012 Jan; 307(4):369-70. PubMed ID: 22274682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons.
    Meese AJ; Oman NB
    Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Respecting Religious Freedoms and Protecting the Public's Health.
    Hodge JG
    Public Health Rep; 2015; 130(5):546-9. PubMed ID: 26327735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Religious freedom and women's health--the litigation on contraception.
    Jost TS
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 23252500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How many Justices does it take to change the U.S. health system? Only one, but it has to want to change.
    Sage WM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):27-33. PubMed ID: 22976410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of public health in America: 'Guaranteed Issue' mandates.
    Kim J
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2017 Sep; 39(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 27591299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. RUNNING MOM AND POP BUSINESSES BY THE GOOD BOOK: THE SCOPE OF RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF BUSINESS OWNERS.
    Selznick LF
    Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(4):1353-92. PubMed ID: 27071216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.
    Vernick JS; Rutkow L; Webster DW; Teret SP
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 101(11):2021-6. PubMed ID: 21940936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Understanding the failure of health-care exceptionalism in the Supreme Court's Obamacare decision.
    Moncrieff AR
    Chest; 2012 Sep; 142(3):559-562. PubMed ID: 22847071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A mutual aid society?
    Jost TS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 22976405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contraception at risk.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Jan; 370(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 24328442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.