125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21887473)
1. Power Doppler and gray-scale sonography standardized by BI-RADS for the differentiation of benign postoperative lesion and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.
Kubota K; Iwasa H; Aoyama N; Hamada N; Nogami M; Tamura T; Nishioka A; Ogawa Y
Oncol Rep; 2011 Dec; 26(6):1357-62. PubMed ID: 21887473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
Tozaki M; Fukuma E
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography.
Zdemir A; Kiliç K; Ozdemir H; Yücel C; Andaç S; Colak M
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Feb; 23(2):183-95; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 14992355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Diagnostic Value of 3D Power Doppler Ultrasound Combined With VOCAL in the Vascular Distribution of Breast Masses.
Wang H; Yan B; Yue L; He M; Liu Y; Li H
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 31053481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Kizilkaya E
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 18243623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging.
Ozdemir A; Ozdemir H; Maral I; Konuş O; Yücel S; Işik S
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Oct; 20(10):1091-101; quiz 1102. PubMed ID: 11587016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of the US BI-RADS final assessment following mastectomy: BI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
Gweon HM; Son EJ; Youk JH; Kim JA; Chung J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 22302210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of enhanced Doppler ultrasound in differentiation of benign vs. malignant scar lesion after breast surgery for malignancy.
Bäz E; Madjar H; Reuss C; Vetter M; Hackelöer B; Holz K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 15(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 10976477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.
Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography.
Kook SH; Park HW; Lee YR; Lee YU; Pae WK; Park YL
J Clin Ultrasound; 1999 Jun; 27(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 10355886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)].
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjäger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R
Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions.
del Cura JL; Elizagaray E; Zabala R; Legórburu A; Grande D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1788-94. PubMed ID: 15908531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The demonstration of blood flow in focal breast lesions by power-Doppler sonography. A new approach to assessment?].
Milz P; Kessler M; Lienemann A; Opitz N; Reiser M
Rofo; 1998 Sep; 169(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 9779062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
