138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21887534)
1. Immunohistochemical staining of human sperm cells in smears from sexual assault cases.
Christoffersen S
Int J Legal Med; 2011 Nov; 125(6):887-90. PubMed ID: 21887534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sperm Hy-Liter™: an effective tool for the detection of spermatozoa in sexual assault exhibits.
De Moors A; Georgalis T; Armstrong G; Modler J; Frégeau CJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 23571070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SPERM HY-LITER™ for the identification of spermatozoa from sexual assault evidence.
Westring CG; Wiuf M; Nielsen SJ; Fogleman JC; Old JB; Lenz C; Reich KA; Morling N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():161-7. PubMed ID: 24997321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postmortem identification of spermatozoa on human skin based on fluorescent monoclonal antibody method.
Elshama SS; Aly SM; Abdalla ME; Hassan WA
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2017; 67(2):121-133. PubMed ID: 29363898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a quantitative validation method for forensic investigation of human spermatozoa using a commercial fluorescence staining kit (SPERM HY-LITER™ Express).
Takamura A; Watanabe K; Akutsu T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1421-1429. PubMed ID: 27184658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Developmental validation of the SPERM HY-LITER™ kit for the identification of human spermatozoa in forensic samples.
Miller KW; Old J; Fischer BR; Schweers B; Stipinaite S; Reich K
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):853-65. PubMed ID: 21595688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced forensic validation for human spermatozoa identification using SPERM HY-LITER™ Express with quantitative image analysis.
Takamura A; Watanabe K; Akutsu T
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jul; 131(4):933-939. PubMed ID: 28102433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of spermatozoa detection using immunofluorescent staining and laser micro-dissection.
Ping YS; Chan XL; Goh SK; Syn CK
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():72-9. PubMed ID: 26338669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparing semen slides in cases of sexual assault: Do they who smear first smear best?
Nittis M; Cochrane C; Hughes R; Franco M
J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Apr; 79():102130. PubMed ID: 33765597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hospital wet mount examination for the presence of sperm in sexual assault cases is of questionable value.
Cavness S; Choudhury A; Sensabaugh G
J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 24588253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of clinical forensic examination reports on sexual assault.
Jänisch S; Meyer H; Germerott T; Albrecht UV; Schulz Y; Debertin AS
Int J Legal Med; 2010 May; 124(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 20182738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Persistence of Sperm and the Development of Time Since Intercourse (TSI) Guidelines in Sexual Assault Cases at Forensic Science Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Casey DG; Domijan K; MacNeill S; Rizet D; O'Connell D; Ryan J
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):585-592. PubMed ID: 28008604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of sperm and non-sperm male cells in cervicovaginal smears using fluorescence in situ hybridization: applications in alleged sexual assault cases.
Collins KA; Rao PN; Hayworth R; Schnell S; Tap MP; Lantz PE; Geisinger KR; Pettenati MJ
J Forensic Sci; 1994 Nov; 39(6):1347-55. PubMed ID: 7815017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental issues in forensic semen detection.
Stefanidou M; Alevisopoulos G; Spiliopoulou C
West Indian Med J; 2010 Jun; 59(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 21291106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Use of Laser Microdissection in Forensic Sexual Assault Casework: Pros and Cons Compared to Standard Methods.
Costa S; Correia-de-Sá P; Porto MJ; Cainé L
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 28133731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experiences with single locus DNA probes in casework.
Greenhalgh M; Burridge F; Willott G
Forensic Sci Int; 1992 Nov; 57(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 1468729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
