446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21887677)
1. ¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in assessment of myeloma-related bone disease: a systematic review.
van Lammeren-Venema D; Regelink JC; Riphagen II; Zweegman S; Hoekstra OS; Zijlstra JM
Cancer; 2012 Apr; 118(8):1971-81. PubMed ID: 21887677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.
Nanni C; Zamagni E; Farsad M; Castellucci P; Tosi P; Cangini D; Salizzoni E; Canini R; Cavo M; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 May; 33(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 16453155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Zamagni E; Nanni C; Patriarca F; Englaro E; Castellucci P; Geatti O; Tosi P; Tacchetti P; Cangini D; Perrone G; Ceccolini M; Brioli A; Buttignol S; Fanin R; Salizzoni E; Baccarani M; Fanti S; Cavo M
Haematologica; 2007 Jan; 92(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17229635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a review of diagnostic and prognostic features in multiple myeloma and related disorders.
Dammacco F; Rubini G; Ferrari C; Vacca A; Racanelli V
Clin Exp Med; 2015 Feb; 15(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 25218739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of spinal bone marrow infiltration in untreated patients with multiple myeloma.
Hur J; Yoon CS; Ryu YH; Yun MJ; Suh JS
Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 18415787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 18F-FDG PET/CT in myeloma with presumed solitary plasmocytoma of bone.
Nanni C; Rubello D; Zamagni E; Castellucci P; Ambrosini V; Montini G; Cavo M; Lodi F; Pettinato C; Grassetto G; Franchi R; Gross MD; Fanti S
In Vivo; 2008; 22(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 18712181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Radiopharmaceuticals in Multiple Myeloma.
Sachpekidis C; Goldschmidt H; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Molecules; 2019 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 31905752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI in multiple myeloma.
Westerland O; Amlani A; Kelly-Morland C; Fraczek M; Bailey K; Gleeson M; El-Najjar I; Streetly M; Bassett P; Cook GJR; Goh V;
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jul; 48(8):2558-2565. PubMed ID: 33469686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 99mTc-MIBI, and MRI in evaluation of patients with multiple myeloma.
Fonti R; Salvatore B; Quarantelli M; Sirignano C; Segreto S; Petruzziello F; Catalano L; Liuzzi R; Rotoli B; Del Vecchio S; Pace L; Salvatore M
J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 18199607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is there any complimentary role of F-18 NaF PET/CT in detecting of osseous involvement of multiple myeloma? A comparative study for F-18 FDG PET/CT and F-18 FDG NaF PET/CT.
Ak İ; Onner H; Akay OM
Ann Hematol; 2015 Sep; 94(9):1567-75. PubMed ID: 26068066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. F-18 FDG uptake of bone marrow on PET/CT scan: it's correlation with CD38/CD138 expressing myeloma cells in bone marrow of patients with multiple myeloma.
Ak I; Gulbas Z
Ann Hematol; 2011 Jan; 90(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20690019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe).
Nanni C; Versari A; Chauvie S; Bertone E; Bianchi A; Rensi M; Bellò M; Gallamini A; Patriarca F; Gay F; Gamberi B; Ghedini P; Cavo M; Fanti S; Zamagni E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 May; 45(5):712-719. PubMed ID: 29270787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. (18)F-FDG dynamic PET/CT in patients with multiple myeloma: patterns of tracer uptake and correlation with bone marrow plasma cell infiltration rate.
Sachpekidis C; Mai EK; Goldschmidt H; Hillengass J; Hose D; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):e300-7. PubMed ID: 25783508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of modern and conventional imaging techniques in establishing multiple myeloma-related bone disease: a systematic review.
Regelink JC; Minnema MC; Terpos E; Kamphuis MH; Raijmakers PG; Pieters-van den Bos IC; Heggelman BG; Nievelstein RJ; Otten RH; van Lammeren-Venema D; Zijlstra JM; Arens AI; de Rooy JW; Hoekstra OS; Raymakers R; Sonneveld P; Ostelo RW; Zweegman S
Br J Haematol; 2013 Jul; 162(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 23617231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 11C-acetate positron emission tomography is more precise than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating tumor burden and predicting disease risk of multiple myeloma.
Chen M; Zhu W; Du J; Yang C; Han B; Zhou D; Huo L; Zhuang J
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22188. PubMed ID: 34773054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. State of the art imaging of multiple myeloma: comparative review of FDG PET/CT imaging in various clinical settings.
Mesguich C; Fardanesh R; Tanenbaum L; Chari A; Jagannath S; Kostakoglu L
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 83(12):2203-2223. PubMed ID: 25308249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of
Cavo M; Terpos E; Nanni C; Moreau P; Lentzsch S; Zweegman S; Hillengass J; Engelhardt M; Usmani SZ; Vesole DH; San-Miguel J; Kumar SK; Richardson PG; Mikhael JR; da Costa FL; Dimopoulos MA; Zingaretti C; Abildgaard N; Goldschmidt H; Orlowski RZ; Chng WJ; Einsele H; Lonial S; Barlogie B; Anderson KC; Rajkumar SV; Durie BGM; Zamagni E
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Apr; 18(4):e206-e217. PubMed ID: 28368259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [
Moreau P; Attal M; Caillot D; Macro M; Karlin L; Garderet L; Facon T; Benboubker L; Escoffre-Barbe M; Stoppa AM; Laribi K; Hulin C; Perrot A; Marit G; Eveillard JR; Caillon F; Bodet-Milin C; Pegourie B; Dorvaux V; Chaleteix C; Anderson K; Richardson P; Munshi NC; Avet-Loiseau H; Gaultier A; Nguyen JM; Dupas B; Frampas E; Kraeber-Bodere F
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(25):2911-2918. PubMed ID: 28686535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of (11)C-4'-thiothymidine, (11)C-methionine, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of active lesions of multiple myeloma.
Okasaki M; Kubota K; Minamimoto R; Miyata Y; Morooka M; Ito K; Ishiwata K; Toyohara J; Inoue T; Hirai R; Hagiwara S; Miwa A
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 29(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 25421383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
