These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889002)

  • 21. Critical bending moment of four implant-abutment interface designs.
    Lee FK; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 20657869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mechanical behavior and failure analysis of prosthetic retaining screws after long-term use in vivo. Part 3: Preload and tensile fracture load testing.
    Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Ziebert G; Toth J; Iacopino AM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Apr; 17(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 18205737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
    Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Contamination of Implant Screws on Reverse Torque.
    Lee HW; Alkumru H; Ganss B; Lai JY; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1054-60. PubMed ID: 26394341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of repeated torque in small diameter implants with machined and premachined abutments.
    Saboury A; Neshandar Asli H; Vaziri S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e224-30. PubMed ID: 22376004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prosthetic screw detorque values in implants retained as cast bar superstructures or bars modified by the Cresco Ti Precision technique--a comparative in vivo study.
    Schmitt J; Holst S; Eitner S; Schlegel A; Wichmann M; Hamel J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 19418868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Giro G; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21426405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
    Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screw joint stability after the application of retorque in implant-supported dentures under simulated masticatory conditions.
    Farina AP; Spazzin AO; Consani RL; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 24423456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations.
    Bakaeen LG; Winkler S; Neff PA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 12498429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
    Schulte JK; Coffey J
    Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.
    Guda T; Ross TA; Lang LA; Millwater HR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):183-93. PubMed ID: 18762030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
    Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
    Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preload loss in gold prosthesis-retaining screws as a function of time.
    Cantwell A; Hobkirk JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 14982365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of friction-style and spring-style mechanical torque limiting devices for dental implants.
    Vallee MC; Conrad HJ; Basu S; Seong WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18672124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
    Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of repeated torque and salivary contamination on the preload of slotted gold implant prosthetic screws.
    Tzenakis GK; Nagy WW; Fournelle RA; Dhuru VB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Aug; 88(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 12397246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.