BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889080)

  • 1. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers.
    Lemieux G; Hart A; Cheretakis C; Goodmurphy C; Trexler S; McGary C; Retrouvey JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 21889080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT; Grosland NM; Qian F; Southard KA; Stuntz TD; Morgan TA; Marshall SD; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative assessment of orthodontic mini-implant displacement: the effect of initial force application.
    Holst AI; Karl M; Karolczak M; Goellner M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19907734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why are mini-implants lost: the value of the implantation technique!
    Romano FL; Consolaro A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25741821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Ono A; Motoyoshi M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 37(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 18295454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of mono- and bicortical mini-implant stability.
    Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Rudzki-Janson I; Wichelhaus A
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 23598610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
    Baumgaertel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to the orthodontic anchorage mini-implant with finite element analysis.
    Lin TS; Tsai FD; Chen CY; Lin LW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 23374924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Chun YS; Lim WH
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 19154272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mini-implant behavior to shear tensile forces in the porcine mandible.
    Edwards CW; Mah JK
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 21491003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
    Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical indices for orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 53(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 22167023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
    Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.