216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889088)
1. Atypical orthodontic extraction pattern managed by differential en-masse retraction against a temporary skeletal anchorage device in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
Chung KR; Choo H; Lee JH; Kim SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 21889088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1 using C-orthodontic mini-implants.
Chung KR; Cho JH; Kim SH; Kook YA; Cozzani M
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 17029536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unusual extraction treatment of Class I bialveolar protrusion using microimplant anchorage.
Chae JM
Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):367-76. PubMed ID: 17319776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of severe bimaxillary protrusion with miniscrew anchorage: treatment and complications.
Mimura H
Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 19113082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical application of miniscrew implant for maximum anchorage cases].
Xun CL; Zeng XL; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Nov; 39(6):505-8. PubMed ID: 15854326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.
Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 16849080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of Class II protrusion with severe crowding using indirect miniscrew anchorage.
Choi NC; Park YC; Lee HA; Lee KJ
Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1109-18. PubMed ID: 18004931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class I malocclusion with severe bimaxillary protrusion: a successful result.
Bellamine M; Bentahar Z; El Quars F
Odontostomatol Trop; 2013 Dec; 36(144):49-55. PubMed ID: 24624644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of anchorage loss during en-masse retraction with indirectly loaded miniscrews in patients with bimaxillary protrusion.
Monga N; Kharbanda OP; Samrit V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):274-82. PubMed ID: 27476360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects and anchorage potential of sliding mechanics with titanium screws compared with the Tweed-Merrifield technique.
Park HS; Yoon DY; Park CS; Jeoung SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 18405824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate.
Chung KR; Kook YA; Kim SH; Mo SS; Jung JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 18174081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion with temporary anchorage devices.
Mukaida K; Mayahara K; Sanuki-Suzuki R; Tamura T; Shimizu N
J Oral Sci; 2018; 60(2):316-319. PubMed ID: 29925716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speedy surgical-orthodontic treatment with temporary anchorage devices as an alternative to orthognathic surgery.
Chung KR; Kim SH; Lee BS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):787-98. PubMed ID: 19524840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mini-implants for retraction, intrusion and protraction in a Class II division 1 patient.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S
J Orthod; 2007 Sep; 34(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 17761798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chin remodeling in a patient with bimaxillary protrusion and open bite by using mini-implants for temporary anchorage.
Jiang C; Liu Y; Cheng Q; He W; Fang S; Lan T; Wang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):436-444. PubMed ID: 29501119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adult Class II Division 1 patient with severe gummy smile treated with temporary anchorage devices.
Shu R; Huang L; Bai D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 21724093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
