160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889105)
1. Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21889105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):298-308. PubMed ID: 20120610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs.
Morrison GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2387-97. PubMed ID: 19354412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior distributions for likelihood ratios in forensic science.
van den Hout A; Alberink I
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 27702459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?
Morrison GS; Enzinger E
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):374-379. PubMed ID: 27702454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
Enzinger E; Morrison GS; Ochoa F
Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 26746825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Zhang C
Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):492-497. PubMed ID: 27914557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case.
Enzinger E; Morrison GS
Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():30-40. PubMed ID: 28575731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Issues and opportunities: the application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison.
Gold E; Hughes V
Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 25002047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison.
Morrison GS; Enzinger E; Hughes V; Jessen M; Meuwly D; Neumann C; Planting S; Thompson WC; van der Vloed D; Ypma RJF; Zhang C; Anonymous A; Anonymous B
Sci Justice; 2021 May; 61(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 33985678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using subsampling to estimate the strength of handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratios.
Davis LJ; Saunders CP; Hepler A; Buscaglia J
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22018850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of the likelihood ratio for evaluative and investigative purposes in comparative forensic handwriting examination.
Taroni F; Marquis R; Schmittbuhl M; Biedermann A; Thiéry A; Bozza S
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):189-94. PubMed ID: 21907508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour.
Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision analysis in forensic science.
Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives.
Jacquet M; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110124. PubMed ID: 31927397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate.
Morrison GS
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):371-373. PubMed ID: 27702453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
