128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889132)
1. Mirrors, mirrors on the wall…the ubiquitous multiple reflection error.
Lawson R
Cognition; 2012 Jan; 122(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21889132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Naïve predictions of motion and orientation in mirrors: From what we see to what we expect reflections to do.
Savardi U; Bianchi I; Bertamini M
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20015479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Errors in judging information about reflections in mirrors.
Lawson R; Bertamini M
Perception; 2006; 35(9):1265-88. PubMed ID: 17120845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mirror-image confusions: Implications for representation and processing of object orientation.
Gregory E; McCloskey M
Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):110-29. PubMed ID: 20466358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Naive optics: Predicting and perceiving reflections in mirrors.
Bertamini M; Spooner A; Hecht H
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):982-1002. PubMed ID: 14585018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Venus effect in real life and in photographs.
Bertamini M; Lawson R; Jones L; Winters M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1948-64. PubMed ID: 20952791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. People cannot locate the projection of an object on the surface of a mirror.
Lawson R
Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 20096408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. My face through the looking-glass: the effect of mirror reversal on reflection size estimation.
Dieguez S; Scherer J; Blanke O
Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1452-9. PubMed ID: 21723147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring cross-task compatibility in perceiving and producing facial expressions using electromyography.
Otte E; Jost K; Habel U; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 21737052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Action control while seeing mirror images of one's own movements: effects of perspective on spatial compatibility.
Sutter C; Müsseler J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Sep; 63(9):1757-69. PubMed ID: 20175024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. View combination: a generalization mechanism for visual recognition.
Friedman A; Waller D; Thrash T; Greenauer N; Hodgson E
Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21334606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fast face recognition: eye blink as a reliable behavioral response.
Usakli AB; Susac A; Gurkan S
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 504(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 21911038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When they see, they see it almost right: normal subjective experience of detected stimuli in spatial neglect.
Bonneh YS; Sagi D; Gorea A; Soroker N; Treger J; Pavlovskaya M
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 446(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18822347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What fits into a mirror: naïve beliefs about the field of view.
Bianchi I; Savardi U
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1144-58. PubMed ID: 22288690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Error positivity is related to attentional control of task switching.
Tanaka H
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):820-4. PubMed ID: 19384255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.
Brady N; Campbell M; Flaherty M
Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15963384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.
Boehm SG; Dering B; Thierry G
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2082-9. PubMed ID: 21477606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How different types of scenes affect the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and the Perceptual Upright (PU).
Haji-Khamneh B; Harris LR
Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1720-7. PubMed ID: 20553740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
