These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889276)
1. Fluorescence flow cytometer to determine urine particle reference intervals in doping control samples. Robinson N; Sottas PE; Saugy M Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Dec; 213(1-3):95-100. PubMed ID: 21889276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results--a multicenter study. Regeniter A; Haenni V; Risch L; Köchli HP; Colombo JP; Frei R; Huber AR Clin Nephrol; 2001 May; 55(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 11393384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urine particles analysis: performance evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i and comparison among urine flow cytometer, dipstick, and visual microscopic examination. Jiang T; Chen P; Ouyang J; Zhang S; Cai D Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2011 Feb; 71(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 21091139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of microscopic review criteria by comparison urine flow cytometer, strip and manual microscopic examination. Xiang D; Cong Y; Wang C; Yue J; Ma X; Lu Y; Liu P; Ma J Clin Lab; 2012; 58(9-10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23163114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speeding up the process urine sample pre-treatment: some perspectives on the use of microwave assisted extraction in the anti-doping field. Mazzarino M; Riggi S; de la Torre X; Botrè F Talanta; 2010 Jun; 81(4-5):1264-72. PubMed ID: 20441894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pediatric reference values for urine particle quantification by using automated flow cytometer: results of a multicenter study of Italian urinalysis group. Manoni F; Gessoni G; Caleffi A; Alessio MG; Rosso R; Menozzi P; Tinello A; Valverde S; Azzarà G; Lippi G Clin Biochem; 2013 Dec; 46(18):1820-4. PubMed ID: 24051212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Searching for new markers of endogenous steroid administration in athletes: "looking outside the metabolic box". Cawley AT; Hine ER; Trout GJ; George AV; Kazlauskas R Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jul; 143(2-3):103-14. PubMed ID: 15240029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urine stability and steroid profile: towards a screening index of urine sample degradation for anti-doping purpose. Mazzarino M; Abate MG; Alocci R; Rossi F; Stinchelli R; Molaioni F; de la Torre X; Botrè F Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Jan; 683(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 21167974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stabilization of human urine doping control samples: II. microbial degradation of steroids. Tsivou M; Livadara D; Georgakopoulos DG; Koupparis MA; Atta-Politou J; Georgakopoulos CG Anal Biochem; 2009 May; 388(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 19232313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reference limits for urine sediments performed on Sysmex UF-50]. Steinmetz J; Henny J; Gueguen R Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 15563425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ensuring high quality in anti-doping laboratories. Boghosian T; Barroso O; Ivanova V; Rabin O Bioanalysis; 2012 Jul; 4(13):1591-601. PubMed ID: 22831475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Medication, athletes and doping regulations]. Hartgens F Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Aug; 152(33):1844-8. PubMed ID: 18783164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Veterinary medicines and competition animals: the question of medication versus doping control. Toutain PL Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2010; (199):315-39. PubMed ID: 20204593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doping control container for urine stabilization: a pilot study. Tsivou M; Giannadaki E; Hooghe F; Roels K; Van Gansbeke W; Garribba F; Lyris E; Deventer K; Mazzarino M; Donati F; Georgakopoulos DG; Van Eenoo P; Georgakopoulos CG; de la Torre X; Botrè F Drug Test Anal; 2017 May; 9(5):699-712. PubMed ID: 27497113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sports drug testing: Analytical aspects of selected cases of suspected, purported, and proven urine manipulation. Thevis M; Geyer H; Sigmund G; Schänzer W J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2012 Jan; 57():26-32. PubMed ID: 21955645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement uncertainty in anti-doping quantitative analysis for prohibited threshold substances. Barroso O; Miller J; Squirrell A; Westwood S Bioanalysis; 2012 Jul; 4(13):1653-65. PubMed ID: 22831481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stabilization of human urine doping control samples: a current opinion. Tsivou M; Georgakopoulos DG; Dimopoulou HA; Koupparis MA; Atta-Politou J; Georgakopoulos CG Anal Bioanal Chem; 2011 Aug; 401(2):553-61. PubMed ID: 21499681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parallel analysis of stimulants in saliva and urine by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: perspectives for "in competition" anti-doping analysis. Strano-Rossi S; Colamonici C; Botrè F Anal Chim Acta; 2008 Jan; 606(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 18082653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast analysis of doping agents in urine by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry I. Screening analysis. Badoud F; Grata E; Perrenoud L; Avois L; Saugy M; Rudaz S; Veuthey JL J Chromatogr A; 2009 May; 1216(20):4423-33. PubMed ID: 19342059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF1000i flow cytometer for ruling out bacterial urinary tract infection. De Rosa R; Grosso S; Bruschetta G; Avolio M; Stano P; Modolo ML; Camporese A Clin Chim Acta; 2010 Aug; 411(15-16):1137-42. PubMed ID: 20359474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]