252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21889968)
1. Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.
Wu Y; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
Biol Psychol; 2011 Dec; 88(2-3):253-62. PubMed ID: 21889968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social distance and anonymity modulate fairness consideration: An ERP study.
Yu R; Hu P; Zhang P
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13452. PubMed ID: 26293456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpersonal relationship modulates brain responses to outcome evaluation when gambling for/against others: an electrophysiological analysis.
Leng Y; Zhou X
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():205-14. PubMed ID: 25218954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
Boksem MA; De Cremer D
Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
Hu X; Mai X
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
Campanhã C; Minati L; Fregni F; Boggio PS
J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15569-74. PubMed ID: 22031902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of altruistic tendency on fairness in third-party punishment.
Sun L; Tan P; Cheng Y; Chen J; Qu C
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():820. PubMed ID: 26191009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
Ma Q; Hu Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abnormal brain responses to social fairness in depression: an fMRI study using the Ultimatum Game.
Gradin VB; Pérez A; MacFarlane JA; Cavin I; Waiter G; Engelmann J; Dritschel B; Pomi A; Matthews K; Steele JD
Psychol Med; 2015 Apr; 45(6):1241-51. PubMed ID: 25277236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation.
Wu Y; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():114-22. PubMed ID: 19539614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
