These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Carpentier-Edwards Magna ease versus Magna valves: a comparison of in-vitro valve hydrodynamic performance. Dal Lin C; Bottio T; Buratto E; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Savona V; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 22474752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position. Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of functional parameters of mechanical and biological valve prostheses]. De Gaetano G; Barberis L; Dottori V; Parodi E; Passerone GC; Lijoi A; Kandil H; Gnecco G; Badano L; Venere G Minerva Cardioangiol; 1993 Sep; 41(9):365-70. PubMed ID: 8259231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mitral and mitro-aortic valve replacement with Sorin Bicarbon valves compared with St. Jude Medical valves. Camilleri LF; Bailly P; Legault BJ; Miguel B; D'Agrosa-Boiteux MC; de Riberolles CM Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Jun; 9(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 11336851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized sorin bicarbon prostheses. De Carlo M; Milano AD; Nardi C; Mecozzi G; Bortolotti U J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Aug; 126(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 12928629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy. Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement? Spiliotopoulos K; Armstrong S; Maganti M; David TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S74-7. PubMed ID: 22104672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative? Antunes MJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 98(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 2796355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position]. Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial experience with the medtronic ADVANTAGE valve prosthesis in the mitral position--clinical outcome and analysis of complications. Reiss N; Seifert D; Koertke H; Hoffmann-Koch A; Kleikamp G; Bairaktaris A; Koerfer R Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 55(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 17410499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children. Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; Al-Ahmadi M; McCrindle BW; Kalloghlian A; Siblini G; Bulbul Z; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 21353791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]