These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21890230)

  • 21. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation.
    Verzijden MN; ten Cate C; Servedio MR; Kozak GM; Boughman JW; Svensson EI
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2012 Sep; 27(9):511-9. PubMed ID: 22705159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Female mate fidelity in a Lek mating system and its implications for the evolution of cooperative lekking behavior.
    DuVal EH
    Am Nat; 2013 Feb; 181(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 23348775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deadbeats or losers: Discretionary male parental investment can make females less choosy.
    Meacham F; Getty T
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 422():50-58. PubMed ID: 28414086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Male dominance, female mate choice, and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus).
    Casalini M; Agbali M; Reichard M; Konecná M; Bryjová A; Smith C
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):366-76. PubMed ID: 19154367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.
    Owens IP; Thompson DB
    Proc Biol Sci; 1994 Nov; 258(1352):93-9. PubMed ID: 7838858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Male mate choice relies on major histocompatibility complex class I in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
    Roth O; Sundin J; Berglund A; Rosenqvist G; Wegner KM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):929-38. PubMed ID: 24725009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):919-48. PubMed ID: 18462318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?
    Venner S; Bernstein C; Dray S; Bel-Venner MC
    Am Nat; 2010 Jun; 175(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 20415532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).
    Deaton R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18765273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.
    Kokko H; Jennions MD; Houde A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1317-24. PubMed ID: 17360285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evolution of ape and human mating systems.
    Nakahashi W; Horiuchi S
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Mar; 296():56-64. PubMed ID: 22155135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.
    Kokko H; Johnstone RA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Mar; 357(1419):319-30. PubMed ID: 11958700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mate choice for optimal (k)inbreeding.
    Puurtinen M
    Evolution; 2011 May; 65(5):1501-5. PubMed ID: 21521199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling the evolution of female choice strategies under inbreeding conditions.
    Reinhold K
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 12555777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring the fitness benefits of male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Evolution; 2012 Aug; 66(8):2646-53. PubMed ID: 22834761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.