These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

967 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21891895)

  • 1. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repair of amalgam restorations with composite resin and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study.
    Popoff DA; Gonçalves FS; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Ferreira RC; Mjör IA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):799-803. PubMed ID: 22484874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.
    Cenci MS; Piva E; Potrich F; Formolo E; Demarco FF; Powers JM
    Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15322639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation.
    Muniz M; Quioca J; Dolci GS; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 15853109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam repair: evaluation of bond strength and microleakage.
    Ozer F; Unlü N; Oztürk B; Sengun A
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11931139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage around bonded amalgam coronal-radicular cores in endodontically treated molar teeth.
    Howdle MD; Fox K; Youngson CC
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 11887532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.