These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21891903)

  • 1. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 9611942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study.
    Wayne JS; Chande R; Porter HC; Janus C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):925-31. PubMed ID: 24726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations.
    Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can internal stresses explain the fracture resistance of cusp-replacing composite restorations?
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Barink M; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Oct; 113(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 16202034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of bonded model Class I 'restorations' after shrinkage.
    Rodrigues FP; Silikas N; Watts DC; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 22036589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
    J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A mathematical analysis of shrinkage stress development in dental composite restorations during resin polymerization.
    Li J; Li H; Fok SL
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 18191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.