156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21892035)
1. Underperformance of gallium-67 scan is greater in relapse than in initial staging, compared with FDG PET.
Huang YY; You DL; Liu MC; Tan TD; Lee PI; Lee MY
Clin Nucl Med; 2011 Oct; 36(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21892035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose coincidence gamma camera tomography with gallium scanning for the staging of lymphoma.
Lin P; Chu J; Kneebone A; Moylan E; Jalaludin B; Pocock N; Kiat H; Rosenfeld D
Intern Med J; 2005 Feb; 35(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15705137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of FDG-PET imaging in the management of lymphoma.
Kostakoglu L; Leonard JP; Coleman M; Goldsmith SJ
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2004 Feb; 2(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 16163171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with FDG-PET/CT in staging of lymphoma patients.
Abdulqadhr G; Molin D; Aström G; Suurküla M; Johansson L; Hagberg H; Ahlström H
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 21498346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gallium-67 citrate scintigraphy for detecting malignant lymphoma.
Shen YY; Kao A; Yen RF
Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 11836600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) and a comparison of (18)F-FDG-pet with (67)gallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of lymphoma: relation to histologic subtypes based on the World Health Organization classification.
Tsukamoto N; Kojima M; Hasegawa M; Oriuchi N; Matsushima T; Yokohama A; Saitoh T; Handa H; Endo K; Murakami H
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 17582800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 18F-FDG-PET in patients with malignant lymphoma having long-term follow-up: staging and restaging, and evaluation of treatment response and recurrence.
Isohashi K; Tatsumi M; Higuchi I; Inoue A; Nakajo K; Ishikawa J; Shimosegawa E; Kanakura Y; Nakamura H; Hatazawa J
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Nov; 22(9):795-802. PubMed ID: 19039558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma.
Kostakoglu L; Leonard JP; Kuji I; Coleman M; Vallabhajosula S; Goldsmith SJ
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 94(4):879-88. PubMed ID: 11920454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical value of FDG PET using coincident gamma cameras in staging and restaging of malignant lymphoma--compared with convenitonal diagnostic methods].
Pichler R; Maschek W; Hatzl-Griesenhofer M; Huber H; Wimmer G; Wahl G; Fridrik M
Nuklearmedizin; 2000 Sep; 39(6):166-73. PubMed ID: 11057408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of 18F-FDG coincidence SPECT imaging and computed tomography in the initial staging and therapeutic evaluation of lymphomas].
Qiao WL; Zhao JH; Wang C; He ZY; Wang TS; Xing Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 29(7):536-9. PubMed ID: 18069637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the staging of malignant lymphoma compared with CT and 67Ga scan.
Hong SP; Hahn JS; Lee JD; Bae SW; Youn MJ
Yonsei Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(5):779-86. PubMed ID: 14584092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and PET/computed tomography imaging characteristics of thyroid lymphoma and their potential clinical utility.
Basu S; Li G; Bural G; Alavi A
Acta Radiol; 2009 Mar; 50(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19089692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computerized tomography and F-18-FDG positron emission tomography in staging of malignant lymphomas: a comparison].
Bumann D; de Wit M; Beyer W; Beese M; Lübeck M; Bücheler E; Clausen M
Rofo; 1998 May; 168(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 9617362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of PET in lymphoma.
Schwaiger M; Wieder H
Chang Gung Med J; 2005 May; 28(5):315-25. PubMed ID: 16086546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management.
Montravers F; McNamara D; Landman-Parker J; Grahek D; Kerrou K; Younsi N; Wioland M; Leverger G; Talbot JN
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Sep; 29(9):1155-65. PubMed ID: 12192560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of early 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gallium-67 scintigraphy in aggressive lymphoma: a prospective comparative study.
Fruchart C; Reman O; Le Stang N; Musafiri D; Cheze S; Macro M; Switsers O; Aide N; Liegard M; Levaltier X; Peny AM; Leporrier M; Bardet S
Leuk Lymphoma; 2006 Dec; 47(12):2547-57. PubMed ID: 17169799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body hybrid PET with 18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Tatsumi M; Kitayama H; Sugahara H; Tokita N; Nakamura H; Kanakura Y; Nishimura T
J Nucl Med; 2001 Apr; 42(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 11337549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the follow-up of lymphoma.
Zinzani PL; Stefoni V; Tani M; Fanti S; Musuraca G; Castellucci P; Marchi E; Fina M; Ambrosini V; Pellegrini C; Alinari L; Derenzini E; Montini G; Broccoli A; Bacci F; Pileri S; Baccarani M
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(11):1781-7. PubMed ID: 19273712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.
Hoh CK; Glaspy J; Rosen P; Dahlbom M; Lee SJ; Kunkel L; Hawkin RA; Maddahi J; Phelps ME
J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 38(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 9074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Malignant lymphoma].
Okamoto R
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2009 Dec; 36(13):2532-6. PubMed ID: 20009452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
