These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21892715)
1. Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography. Malagò R; Pezzato A; Barbiani C; Mantovani W; Caliari G; Alfonsi U; Tavella D; Mucelli RP Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1203-16. PubMed ID: 21892715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography demonstrate high correlation for area stenosis quantification in noncalcified and mixed plaques. Krupiński M; Miszalski-Jamka T; Guzik B; Andres M; Zmudka K; Mazur W; Pelberg R; Banyś R; Urbańczyk M; Kostkiewicz M Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 23154001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography: computer versus the eye. Sen T; Kilit C; Astarcioglu MA; Asarcikli LD; Aksu T; Kafes H; Parspur A; Gozubuyuk G; Amasyali B Cardiovasc J Afr; 2018; 29(5):278-282. PubMed ID: 30395141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative coronary arterial stenosis assessment by multidetector CT and invasive coronary angiography for identifying patients with myocardial perfusion abnormalities. Godoy GK; Vavere A; Miller JM; Chahal H; Niinuma H; Lemos P; Hoe J; Paul N; Clouse ME; Ramos CD; Lima JA; Arbab-Zadeh A J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):922-30. PubMed ID: 22814771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard. Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of coronary atheroma by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angiography. Ugolini P; Pressacco J; Lespérance J; Berry C; L'Allier PL; Ibrahim R; Grégoire J; Ouellet R; Heinonen T; Levesque S; Guertin MC; Tardif JC Can J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 25(11):641-7. PubMed ID: 19898696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions. Grundeken MJ; Collet C; Ishibashi Y; Généreux P; Muramatsu T; LaSalle L; Kaplan AV; Wykrzykowska JJ; Morel MA; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Onuma Y; Leon MB; Serruys PW Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 28836339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. Budoff MJ; Dowe D; Jollis JG; Gitter M; Sutherland J; Halamert E; Scherer M; Bellinger R; Martin A; Benton R; Delago A; Min JK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(21):1724-32. PubMed ID: 19007693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. Kefer J; Coche E; Legros G; Pasquet A; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15992641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Vavere AL; Arbab-Zadeh A; Rochitte CE; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Gottlieb I; Clouse ME; Bush DE; Hoe JW; de Roos A; Cox C; Lima JA; Miller JM Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 21828192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial. Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. Dewey M; Vavere AL; Arbab-Zadeh A; Miller JM; Sara L; Cox C; Gottlieb I; Yoshioka K; Paul N; Hoe J; de Roos A; Lardo AC; Lima JA; Clouse ME AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 20028910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eight-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography evaluation of significant coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Holmström M; Sillanpää MA; Kupari M; Kivistö S; Lauerma K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006 Oct; 22(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 16645788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided CT coronary artery stenosis detection: comparison with human reading and quantitative coronary angiography. Rief M; Kranz A; Hartmann L; Roehle R; Laule M; Dewey M Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1621-7. PubMed ID: 25117643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses. Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials. Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]