These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21893215)

  • 1. Block urn design - a new randomization algorithm for sequential trials with two or more treatments and balanced or unbalanced allocation.
    Zhao W; Weng Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):953-61. PubMed ID: 21893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness.
    Zhao W; Weng Y; Wu Q; Palesch Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21544929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.
    Zhao W
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5239-48. PubMed ID: 25043719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generalization of Wei's urn design to unequal allocations in sequential clinical trials.
    Zhao W; Ramakrishnan V
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2016 Apr; 2():75-79. PubMed ID: 26878069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.
    Zhao W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jul; 43():209-16. PubMed ID: 26091947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.
    Zhao W; Hill MD; Palesch Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):989-1002. PubMed ID: 22287602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady-state statistical properties and implementation of randomization designs with maximum tolerated imbalance restriction for two-arm equal allocation clinical trials.
    Zhao W; Carter K; Sverdlov O; Scheffold A; Ryeznik Y; Cassarly C; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1194-1212. PubMed ID: 38243729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of statistical and operational properties of subject randomization procedures for large multicenter clinical trial treating medical emergencies.
    Zhao W; Mu Y; Tayama D; Yeatts SD
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Mar; 41():211-8. PubMed ID: 25638754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting a randomization method for a multi-center clinical trial with stochastic recruitment considerations.
    Sverdlov O; Ryeznik Y; Anisimov V; Kuznetsova OM; Knight R; Carter K; Drescher S; Zhao W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):52. PubMed ID: 38418968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Merged block randomisation: A novel randomisation procedure for small clinical trials.
    van der Pas SL
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30761907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exact optimum coin bias in Efron's randomization procedure.
    Antognini AB; Rosenberger WF; Wang Y; Zagoraiou M
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3760-8. PubMed ID: 26123177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.
    Hedden SL; Woolson RF; Malcolm RJ
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2006 Feb; 1():6. PubMed ID: 16722591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
    Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative models and randomization techniques for Bayesian response-adaptive randomization with binary outcomes.
    Proper J; Connett J; Murray T
    Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 18(4):417-426. PubMed ID: 33926267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urn models for response-adaptive randomized designs: a simulation study based on a non-adaptive randomized trial.
    Ghiglietti A; Scarale MG; Miceli R; Ieva F; Mariani L; Gavazzi C; Paganoni AM; Edefonti V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1203-1215. PubMed ID: 29565749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches to expanding the two-arm biased coin randomization to unequal allocation while preserving the unconditional allocation ratio.
    Kuznetsova OM; Johnson VP
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2483-2498. PubMed ID: 28337776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization.
    Gu X; Lee JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials.
    Signorini DF; Leung O; Simes RJ; Beller E; Gebski VJ; Callaghan T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2343-50. PubMed ID: 8134737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Properties of the urn randomization in clinical trials.
    Wei LJ; Lachin JM
    Control Clin Trials; 1988 Dec; 9(4):345-64. PubMed ID: 3203525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.