These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21893425)

  • 41. An estimate of fetal autonomic state by time-frequency analysis of fetal heart rate variability.
    David M; Hirsch M; Karin J; Toledo E; Akselrod S
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Mar; 102(3):1057-64. PubMed ID: 17095644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Integration of multivariate empirical mode decomposition and independent component analysis for fetal ECG separation from abdominal signals.
    Thanaraj P; Roshini M; Balasubramanian P
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):783-794. PubMed ID: 27315149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Multichannel mapping of fetal magnetocardiogram in an unshielded hospital setting.
    Brisinda D; Comani S; Meloni AM; Alleva G; Mantini D; Fenici R
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 May; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 15906428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A novel extraction method of fetal electrocardiogram from the composite abdominal signal.
    Sato M; Kimura Y; Chida S; Ito T; Katayama N; Okamura K; Nakao M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 17260855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R; Kelnar M; Koudelka P; Vanus J; Bilik P; Janku P; Nazeran H; Zidek J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography.
    Mazzeo JR
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7968869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Extraction of foetal ECG from abdominal ECG by nonlinear transformation and estimations.
    John RG; Ramachandran KI
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():193-204. PubMed ID: 31104707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. QRS classification and spatial combination for robust heart rate detection in low-quality fetal ECG recordings.
    Warmerdam G; Vullings R; Van Pul C; Andriessen P; Oei SG; Wijn P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2004-7. PubMed ID: 24110110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Non-invasive fetal electrocardiography in singleton and multiple pregnancies.
    Taylor MJ; Smith MJ; Thomas M; Green AR; Cheng F; Oseku-Afful S; Wee LY; Fisk NM; Gardiner HM
    BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):668-78. PubMed ID: 12842058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of three methods for beat-to-beat-interval extraction from continuous blood pressure and electrocardiogram with respect to heart rate variability analysis.
    Suhrbier A; Heringer R; Walther T; Malberg H; Wessel N
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2006 Jul; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 16915768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
    Graatsma EM; Jacod BC; van Egmond LA; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Abdominal electrocardiography in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Kariniemi V; Rosti J
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 3820035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Fetal ECG extraction via Type-2 adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems.
    Ahmadieh H; Asl BM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Apr; 142():101-108. PubMed ID: 28325438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Accuracy of fetal heart rate monitoring].
    Morgenstern J; Abels T; Somville T; Weis G; Wolf P
    Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 7926954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A method for the automatic reconstruction of fetal cardiac signals from magnetocardiographic recordings.
    Mantini D; Alleva G; Comani S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4763-81. PubMed ID: 16204871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of coincidence of fetal and maternal QRS complexes on fetal heart rate reliability.
    Matonia A; Jezewski J; Kupka T; Horoba K; Wrobel J; Gacek A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2006 May; 44(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 16937181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Extraction of the fetal ECG in noninvasive recordings by signal decompositions.
    Christov I; Simova I; Abächerli R
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1713-21. PubMed ID: 25070127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of gestational age on the effectiveness of spatial and temporal methods for the reconstruction of the fetal magnetocardiogram.
    Comani S; Van Leeuwen P; Lange S; Geue D; Grönemeyer D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Feb; 54(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 19182871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fetal electrocardiogram enhancement in abdominal recordings: recording setup analysis.
    Taralunga DD; MihaelaUngureanu G; Hurezeanu PB; Gussi I; Strungaru R; Wolf W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1907-10. PubMed ID: 24110085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.
    Kwee A; van der Hoorn-van den Beld CW; Veerman J; Dekkers AH; Visser GH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 15280112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.