These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21893624)

  • 1. Analysis of informed consent document utilization in a minimal-risk genetic study.
    Desch K; Li J; Kim S; Laventhal N; Metzger K; Siemieniak D; Ginsburg D
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Sep; 155(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 21893624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How informed is online informed consent?
    Varnhagen CK; Gushta M; Daniels J; Peters TC; Parmar N; Law D; Hirsch R; Takach BS; Johnson T
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 16127857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
    de Oliveira LLH; Vissoci JRN; Machado WL; Rodrigues CG; Limkakeng AT
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 29073806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.
    Ogloff JR; Otto RK
    Ethics Behav; 1991; 1(4):239-52. PubMed ID: 11651140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
    Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval.
    Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA
    Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center.
    Baker MT; Taub HA
    JAMA; 1983 Nov; 250(19):2646-8. PubMed ID: 6632164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research.
    Perrault EK; Keating DM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 29117849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect.
    Theiss JD; Hobbs WB; Giordano PJ; Brunson OM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):11-7. PubMed ID: 25746782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent and patient's rights documents: a right, a rite, or a rewrite?
    Hochhauser M
    Ethics Behav; 1999; 9(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11657485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.
    Paris A; Deygas B; Cornu C; Thalamas C; Maison P; Duale C; Kane M; Hodaj E; Cracowski JL
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 80(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 26147763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
    Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personality, sex of participant, and face-to-face interaction affect reading of informed consent forms.
    Knepp MM
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Feb; 114(1):297-313. PubMed ID: 24765727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Giving consent without getting informed: a cross-cultural issue in research ethics.
    Ghandour L; Yasmine R; El-Kak F
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):12-21. PubMed ID: 23933772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer involvement in consent document development: a multicenter cluster randomized trial to assess study participants' understanding.
    Guarino P; Elbourne D; Carpenter J; Peduzzi P
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 16539087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Videos Improves Informed Consent Comprehension in Web-Based Surveys Among Internet-Using Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hall EW; Sanchez TH; Stein AD; Stephenson R; Zlotorzynska M; Sineath RC; Sullivan PS
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e64. PubMed ID: 28264794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement.
    Perrault EK; Nazione SA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 27329533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A rural community's involvement in the design and usability testing of a computer-based informed consent process for the Personalized Medicine Research Project.
    Mahnke AN; Plasek JM; Hoffman DG; Partridge NS; Foth WS; Waudby CJ; Rasmussen LV; McManus VD; McCarty CA
    Am J Med Genet A; 2014 Jan; 164A(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 24273095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.