These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21894135)

  • 21. Assessment of the factor structure and reliability of the Portuguese version of the General Health Questionnaire-28 among adults.
    De Almeida Vieira Monteiro AP
    J Ment Health; 2011 Feb; 20(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20812853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are exaggerated health complaints continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis of the Health Problem Overstatement Scale.
    Walters GD; Berry DT; Lanyon RI; Murphy MP
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19485676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The new international psychiatric classification system, ICD-10. II. New classification systems in psychiatry].
    Smolík P
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1994 Oct; 133(19):592-5. PubMed ID: 7954672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monitoring treatment response and outcomes using the World Health Organization's Wellbeing Index in psychiatric care.
    Newnham EA; Hooke GR; Page AC
    J Affect Disord; 2010 Apr; 122(1-2):133-8. PubMed ID: 19592116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mild disorders should not be eliminated from the DSM-V.
    Kessler RC; Merikangas KR; Berglund P; Eaton WW; Koretz DS; Walters EE
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2003 Nov; 60(11):1117-22. PubMed ID: 14609887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of an Australian sign language instrument of outcome measurement for adults in mental health settings.
    Munro L; Rodwell J
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 43(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19296288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A multi-centre study of the reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the honos65+ in psychiatry for older persons].
    Aartsen MJ; Spitsbaard AK; van Baarsen C; Dhondt AD; Mascini M; Nefs A; Snoeijers A; van Diest M; Wilting R
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2010; 52(8):543-53. PubMed ID: 20697994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing risk and prioritizing referral for self-harm: when and why is my judgement different from yours?
    Cahill S; Rakow T
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2012 Sep; 19(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 21594954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does the emphasis on risk in psychiatry serve the interests of patients or the public? Yes.
    Morgan JF
    BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f902. PubMed ID: 23404163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thinking Concretely Increases the Perceived Likelihood of Risks: The Effect of Construal Level on Risk Estimation.
    Lermer E; Streicher B; Sachs R; Raue M; Frey D
    Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):623-37. PubMed ID: 26111548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgments and ratings.
    BECK AT; WARD CH; MENDELSON M; MOCK JE; ERBAUGH JK
    Am J Psychiatry; 1962 Oct; 119():351-7. PubMed ID: 13866249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The case against categorical risk estimates.
    Scurich N
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):554-564. PubMed ID: 30288766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The reliability of psychiatric diagnoses.
    ASH P
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1949 Apr; 44(2):272-6. PubMed ID: 18126462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis; a new look.
    SCHMIDT HO; FONDA CP
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1956 Mar; 52(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 13306444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does the emphasis on risk in psychiatry serve the interests of patients or the public? No.
    Large M
    BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f857. PubMed ID: 23404162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability-unreliability of ancillary psychiatric evaluations.
    JENSEN MB; MORRIS WE
    J Clin Psychol; 1960 Jul; 16():248-52. PubMed ID: 14407129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task Reliability Considerations in Computational Psychiatry.
    Hedge C; Bompas A; Sumner P
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2020 Sep; 5(9):837-839. PubMed ID: 32605726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Logit analysis for comparison of treatment effects of categorical data].
    Yang M; Yang Y
    Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 1987 Jun; 18(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 3623541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of Suicide Risk in Mental Health Professionals.
    Gale TM; Hawley CJ; Butler J; Morton A; Singhal A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149791. PubMed ID: 26909886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.