These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21894485)

  • 1. Effect of d-amphetamine on post-error slowing in healthy volunteers.
    Wardle MC; Yang A; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Mar; 220(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 21894485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.
    Kirkpatrick MG; Johanson CE; de Wit H
    J Psychopharmacol; 2013 Mar; 27(3):256-64. PubMed ID: 23343596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.
    Wardle MC; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Mar; 220(1):143-53. PubMed ID: 21947316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective responses to d-amphetamine alone and after pimozide pretreatment in normal, healthy volunteers.
    Brauer LH; de Wit H
    Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Jan; 39(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 8719123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective responses to amphetamine in young adults with previous mood elevation experiences.
    Schepers ST; Arndt DL; Rogers RD; Hedeker D; de Wit H
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Nov; 236(11):3363-3370. PubMed ID: 31209507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human response to repeated low-dose d-amphetamine: evidence for behavioral enhancement and tolerance.
    Strakowski SM; Sax KW; Rosenberg HL; DelBello MP; Adler CM
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2001 Oct; 25(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 11557168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of acute oral naltrexone on the subjective and physiological effects of oral D-amphetamine and smoked cocaine in cocaine abusers.
    Comer SD; Mogali S; Saccone PA; Askalsky P; Martinez D; Walker EA; Jones JD; Vosburg SK; Cooper ZD; Roux P; Sullivan MA; Manubay JM; Rubin E; Pines A; Berkower EL; Haney M; Foltin RW
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2013 Nov; 38(12):2427-38. PubMed ID: 23736314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amphetamine increases activity but not exploration in humans and mice.
    Minassian A; Young JW; Cope ZA; Henry BL; Geyer MA; Perry W
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jan; 233(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 26449721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of genetic variability in the dopamine receptor D2 in relation to behavioral inhibition and impulsivity/sensation seeking: an exploratory study with d-amphetamine in healthy participants.
    Hamidovic A; Dlugos A; Skol A; Palmer AA; de Wit H
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Dec; 17(6):374-83. PubMed ID: 19968402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of D-amphetamine on inhibition and motor planning as a function of baseline performance.
    Allman AA; Benkelfat C; Durand F; Sibon I; Dagher A; Leyton M; Baker GB; O'Driscoll GA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Sep; 211(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 20602089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective responses predict d-amphetamine choice in healthy volunteers.
    Murray CH; Li J; Weafer J; de Wit H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2021 May; 204():173158. PubMed ID: 33675838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High dose pimozide does not block amphetamine-induced euphoria in normal volunteers.
    Brauer LH; De Wit H
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Feb; 56(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 9050084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of D-amphetamine on emotion-potentiated startle in healthy humans: implications for psychopathy and antisocial behaviour.
    Corr PJ; Kumari V
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Jan; 225(2):373-9. PubMed ID: 22864946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A triazolam/amphetamine dose-effect interaction study: dissociation of effects on memory versus arousal.
    Mintzer MZ; Griffiths RR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Jun; 192(3):425-40. PubMed ID: 17342474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of an acute d-amphetamine administration on context information memory in healthy volunteers: evidence from a source memory task.
    Zeeuws I; Deroost N; Soetens E
    Hum Psychopharmacol; 2010; 25(4):326-34. PubMed ID: 20521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain potential indices of novelty processing are associated with preference for amphetamine.
    Gabbay FH; Duncan CC; McDonald CG
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):470-88. PubMed ID: 21186922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling sensitization to stimulants in humans: an [11C]raclopride/positron emission tomography study in healthy men.
    Boileau I; Dagher A; Leyton M; Gunn RN; Baker GB; Diksic M; Benkelfat C
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 Dec; 63(12):1386-95. PubMed ID: 17146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personality and gender differences in effects of d-amphetamine on risk taking.
    White TL; Lejuez CW; de Wit H
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Dec; 15(6):599-609. PubMed ID: 18179313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute effects of lisdexamfetamine and D-amphetamine on social cognition and cognitive performance in a placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects.
    Dolder PC; Strajhar P; Vizeli P; Odermatt A; Liechti ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 May; 235(5):1389-1402. PubMed ID: 29511807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcing, subject-rated, performance and physiological effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in stimulant abusing humans.
    Stoops WW; Glaser PE; Fillmore MT; Rush CR
    J Psychopharmacol; 2004 Dec; 18(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 15582920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.